Firstly I would like to say it is good to see this thread active and vibrant, keep up the good work people.
I think it is important to keep an open mind to all possibilities in this case, rd has done some great work with the photos, I can make out the face and sunglasses but don’t make out the taser, perhaps that is my monitor however I am going to keep an open mind for now on what the poi is dressed as could be LE, security guard, chef etc.
At one time someone (I forget who it was) thought they made out the initials SPCA on the poi’s shirt and there is an SPCA centre nearby on Conroy Road.
Is this worth checking out if there is some kind of uniform that workers at SPCA wear?
CatLynette or SS maybe something you could do? (I would but London is a little far away!!!)
Cell/Mobile Phones
The mobile/cell phone pings is interesting.
About 10 years ago in the UK 3 major drug dealers in Essex were found murdered in a field in the countryside, one of the compelling pieces of evidence used at the trial of the 2 hit men and getaway driver was that all their mobile phones were pinging in the same area at the time of the murder.
They essentially traced their route using pings to see them all converge at the scene at the correct time. (they claimed they were elsewhere and were proved to be lying unless someone had stolen their phones)
Based on this as I understand it the phone is constantly ‘pinging’ so you should be able to trace when Jennifer’s’ phone stopped pinging (this is assuming she left it on)
LE should be able to get this and perhaps have it however it could be more withholding information for example if they declare that Jennifer’s phone stopped pinging at 8am then the poi knows to provide an alibi/story from 8am onwards so I can see one of the reasons for not sharing this information however it is my feeling that now this is case is cold so it would be best to put all cards on the table in any attempt to make progress.
The Dog
I know jack all about tracker dogs but as I understand it the dog tracked from the car back to mosaic, to a fence and to the stairwell of Jennifer’s condo.
If this is correct is it not a fantastic coincidence that if the dog was tracking wrong he went back to Jennifer’s complex?
He could have gone anywhere surely?
HOTG? The Mall? Timbuk two?
Mosaic
Let’s look at the facts around this complex.
Within 8 weeks of living in this new complex Jennifer goes missing.
Jennifer had expressed concern at the through traffic (workmen) at her apartment.
Jennifer thought someone was trying to break in one night (Unconfirmed)
The place has a terrible reputation for crime.
Our suspect upon dumping Jennifer’s car heads back in the direction of Mosaic and according to the tracker dog actually goes back to the mosaic complex.
The fact the car is dumped so close by again suggests someone local to the area if not why not dump the car miles away?
The majority of criminals operate in areas they know and to pick up on lefts point the car is dumped very soon after the alarm is raised and in view of CCTV.
What are the chances the perp knew the heat was on and had to get rid of the car quick?
Jennifer is abducted upon returning from a weekend away with her boyfriend, a coincidence perhaps but not in my opinion and I stress it is just my opinion I think the perp knew where she had been.
Theory
My theory based on what is mostly circumstantial evidence is that Jennifer was abducted near or in her car at mosaic by someone who knew her and had developed a crush/fixation on her but snapped when she went away with her boyfriend.
I think one of two scenarios occurred
1) Jennifer was driven or forced to drive out of mosaic to somewhere else if the taser was involved she may have been debilitated and driven, I won’t comment on what happens next but when a few hours later the perp drives towards home and dumps the car within walking distance of mosaic where he has to go as he lives/works there.
2) Jennifer is abducted leaving her apartment and taken to another apartment of a resident or an empty one and held hostage, when the poi realises the heat is on or soon will be he removes the car to HOTG to make it look like Jennifer went to work again not going far as he has to go back to Mosaic, he then removes Jennifer from Mosaic at another time, perhaps at night in his own vehicle.
Again I would like to stress these are my thoughts and theories and not FACT, I would happily have my ideas blown out of the water with the truth if it is different.
Again I have to agree with left that hard graft detective work would solve this case.
