I don't follow this thread much, as there are a couple of others that I do follow and that's about all I can manage. This seems like the best place for my question, so I hope you all can help me. First of all, I should make it clear that I believe JA is guilty of 1st degree felony murder and I believe the State has proven that beyond a reasonable doubt (yes, I have formed my opinion without hearing all the evidence). Second, I am opposed to the death penalty in all cases and I'm not much interested in that aspect of this case. I live in Texas and am ashamed of this state's history and reputation regarding the death penalty. Here's my question:
When did the "battered woman" (self defense) defense first appear in this case? On 4/11/13, during her time on the stand answering juror questions, ALV stated that when she first met her JA spoke very positively about Travis and "didn't want to think of herself" as a battered woman. I believe ALV first met JA in November 2011. I just can't form a complete understanding about where the battered woman defense came from in this case. Can anybody answer that for me?
So there's my question and here are a couple of observations that I've been itching to contribute:
When ALV first took the stand she spoke about her belief that Hollywood portrays an unrealistic view of intimate partner abuse. She said that in movies the victim (woman) is always a much loved, sweet, innocent character and the abuser (man) is a monster. ALV said that is seldom the case in real life but that's pretty much the way she has characterized the relationship between JA and Travis. According to ALV Travis was a womanizing, dishonest cad who had everybody fooled and JA was just one in the procession of Travis's innocent victims. According to ALV JA always tried to placate Travis and never lied until after she brutally murdered him.
Finally, my understanding of cases in which the battered woman defense has been successful involved horrific on-going abuse in relationships that is more in line with the classic dominating abuser who has succeeded in isolating his partner and working over time to make the woman completely dependent on him. The women in such situations kill out of desperation and fear for their lives. This is clearly not the case here so it seems to me that the battered woman defense, even if the incidents of violence that JA now reports did occur, is not applicable. The defense hasn't put forth evidence to support total domination by Travis and JA being or feeling trapped in the relationship. The only testimony that JA feared for her life was JA's own and there are clearly secondary gains associated with her saying so (not to mention that she drove 1000 miles, and worked diligently to cover her tracks before and after, to put herself in that "life threatening" situation). Have I missed other testimony that supports those claims? TIA for any feedback.