ReadySet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 2,438
- Reaction score
- 13,996
Good points.
Maybe they lied about what he was wearing when he disappeared. Or they were so out of it they didn't even remember. After all, there are no pictures of him, or anyone, at the campground.
Maybe they lied about what he was wearing when he disappeared. Or they were so out of it they didn't even remember. After all, there are no pictures of him, or anyone, at the campground.
Just my thoughts but the clothing items seem unlikely to be exactly the same ones he was wearing when he disappeared and here's my thoughts on why
-If he had been killed with the clothing on there probably would have been some type of evidence on them, or even evidence that they were at the campsite.
-To eliminate all that evidence, they would have had to disrobe him before killing which would mean it was premeditated, and there's just no evidence for that.
-Keeping the items is problematic, why wouldn't they burn or dispose of them somehow? And if you're going to hang onto that kind of evidence, you wouldn't just neglect to take it with you and leave it for police to find.
Obviously there are ways around each of those points (like certain types of death that wouldn't put evidence on clothing) but just some thoughts on why I think it unlikely those were THE items he was wearing when he disappeared. JMO