With all due respect, this is not a solid, well thought out theory. It has a murderer taking the girls away and then carrying their dead bodies, one at a time, through some precarious terrain next to inhabited homes to almost the same area from which they were taken and which was the center of attention in the search. This would assume that no one was on the lookout for vehicles driving on the roadways near the bridge which means it assumes that LE is stupid, they all went home after the preliminary search and no one had the night shift.
It also ignores the footprints on the bank which searchers found and ignores LE telling us that the girls crossed the creek.
We really have to dispose of theories that are founded in guesses and keep to what we know as truths.
The audio of the events captured more than we are privy to and if there was a HINT of evidence that a vehicle was used, LE would have been shouting it from the rooftops. They didn't. They said the girls crossed the creek, alive.
How do we know they were alive when they crossed the creek? Because LE described the terrain they would have had to maneuver.
With all due respect, I disagree. Big surprise, huh.
First of all, I believe this was planned for months ahead. The killer got a huge head start. He figured out exactly how he was going to carry all this out.
Just because it might not make sense to US doesn't mean one thing. I contend that there were NO fly-by-the-seat-of-his-pants decisions that day. Not one.
He already checked out the surroundings. He knew how he was going to carry it all out. Imo, he had a scanner, listening closely to everything LE was doing that night.
He knew how to avoid all the traps. I believe he had an accomplice who helped bring the girls to where they were found. DeDee has mentioned a hunter's 'deer sled' which is very plausible.
The killer wasn't abiding by any of OUR rules or concerns. He was two steps ahead the whole time, and had been for months.
I have no doubt he is laughing at everyone right now. But someday I truly believe WE will have the last laugh.
He's going to screw up eventually.
Also, for the umpteenth time, (and please don't take anything I say personally) I do NOT believe LE is saying the girls crossed the creek. I also do not believe that it bothers them one bit to have people think they DID say that.
It's unclear, and again, there may be a reason known only to LE.
As for the audio by LE of the kidnapping, it is my belief that the killer took Libby's phone when he put her in his trunk. If he did, I don't believe he kept the audio going.
That could explain why LE would have no absolute knowledge of a vehicle involved.
Again, this is just my opinion. Yours is different and yours may be correct. So please don't take offense.
I know my attitude is 'showing' at times, but it is more a reflection of my frustration with this killer still being free, than with any individual poster.
I don't mean to take out that frustration on others..
So please keep posting, and I will keep reading. I have learned a lot from your posts...