I comprehend that, from an investigative perspective, delving into the theme of nutrition may not give you definitive evidence pointing directly to someone or something significant. Nevertheless, common sense and experience suggest that exploring this aspect could be worthwhile. While discussions often revolve around choices, it's good to consider scenarios where the perpetrator might not have had a choice in his last meal.We don't know he typically adheres to anything. It's just that the last meal he ate included sesame string beans. As per my last post, four ice cream cups sounds odd on paper. But if he's starving, geed up, injured and he needs something now? I don't know, for me it's not among the weirdest parts about this case
There's also the possibility that his profile is not entirely accurate. Particularly, questions arise regarding how the police determined that he was lean. If this characterisation holds true, a vegetable-based diet could have been his norm, rendering the 4 cups of ice-cream an anomaly. On the contrary, if he wasn't lean and indulged in ice-cream due to a temporary lack of high-calorie options, one might infer that the vegetable choice wasn't voluntary. This could hint at his presence in the local vicinity, visiting, where people prepared such meals, possibly explaining the consumption of 4 cups in one go.
Another intriguing aspect is his prolonged stay in the house without attempting to flee. Could he have been waiting for transportation, like a plane or boat to another country? The choice of hat adds another layer of curiosity; a hat typically associated with an older man seems an unusual selection for a 15 year old. Did he purchase it? The deliberation behind choosing that 'old man' hat could offer insights into his mindset. May be he was older after all, like 20-25 or even older?
The purpose behind acquiring the knife also raises interesting questions.