carbuff
Well-Known Member
There are now 65 exclusions on the rule-out list. Unidentified Person Case
They are still working hard to get you home, JD
Updated link. Still 65 ruleouts.
Unidentified Person Case
There are now 65 exclusions on the rule-out list. Unidentified Person Case
They are still working hard to get you home, JD
Kentucky Jane Doe 2001 (KY) NamUs #UP71 - extraction complete. On way to sequencing lab.
Sorry, but I dont know how to view the rule out list after getting to the Namus page. I would appreciate it if anyone could tell me how.
I was trying to look at at Tammi Jean Campbell regarding this case. I know she has probably been ruled out but just making sure.
Missing Person Case
Sorry, but I dont know how to view the rule out list after getting to the Namus page. I would appreciate it if anyone could tell me how.
I was trying to look at at Tammi Jean Campbell regarding this case. I know she has probably been ruled out but just making sure.
Missing Person Case
What’s the possible match? I’d love to take a look.I submitted a possible match in 2017, my suggestion has not been listed in the ruleout list. The lady I submitted for matching did not have dental records, and I received an email stating they are hoping for a DNA match and too bad my suggestion did not have dental records. Just curious as to how long it takes on matching the DNA?
What’s the possible match? I’d love to take a look.
Lynne not Lynn autocorrect misspelled i, my apologies.
Haha! They have so many now! While we can’t see Kentucky Jane Doe’s FTDNA matches, she has okay matches on GEDMatch. They aren’t very high but they are better than many of the cases DDP has.How did I not realize this was a DDP case?! And how on earth was Sharon Apgar ruled out I wonder?
I’ve not familiarized myself with their Doc, but it’s magnificent!! I just can’t believe I missed this! (I’m elated about Julie!! Just seeing her highlighted in bright yellow makes my soul smile - but what the heck with Tom Green County John Doe?! ) anywho....Haha! They have so many now! While we can’t see Kentucky Jane Doe’s FTDNA matches, she has okay matches on GEDMatch. They aren’t very high but they are better than many of the cases DDP has.
None that have been announced.I guess rose tattoos on the breast aren’t all that uncommon, just seemed like just a good fit. Well, she’s in good hands, no doubt. Since I’m obviously out of the loop, are there any particulars that have come to light since they took the case? (Origin, ancestry, etc.) She’s got so many exclusions, I don’t foresee me finding the needle amongst the haystack, but just for my info...
I guess rose tattoos on the breast aren’t all that uncommon, just seemed like just a good fit. Well, she’s in good hands, no doubt. Since I’m obviously out of the loop, are there any particulars that have come to light since they took the case? (Origin, ancestry, etc.) She’s got so many exclusions, I don’t foresee me finding the needle amongst the haystack, but just for my info...