Maybe the person also refused doing voluntary DNA?
Or even better he pretended he wasn't home.
Maybe the person also refused doing voluntary DNA?
If you connect the dots I believe it was a young killer.
Police probably have a good idea of the profile. They got tips from the public. They asked everybody who knows someone who had access to a dark suv. "Access" like using your parents car?
They are trying to communicate with him, cauze if he's young and inexperimented. They probably believe that he'll stress. If he does he might panick, and that might wake up his parents/friends who don't suspect him.
Imagine if its a 20 years old living in his parents house. Having a crush on that beautiful girl jogging. One week his parents are in vacation, he has the house for himself. Bang. He feels invincible. No one sees his scratches/bruises. And as of now he's getting away with it.
Or even better he pretended he wasn't home.
Although I wish they did, I don't think they have a clue who it is, and this question keeps coming back to me...
If they are so certain that the SUV was involved, rather than just acting on a tip, then why the DNA dragnet?
One thing I also want to point out.
It was stated in a previous post here, that what Vanessa had for breakfast makes no difference. Nothing could be further from the truth, Stomach contents I am sure was a factor in determining time of death.
Although I wish they did, I don't think they have a clue who it is, and this question keeps coming back to me...
If they are so certain that the SUV was involved, rather than just acting on a tip, then why the DNA dragnet?
One thing I also want to point out.
It was stated in a previous post here, that what Vanessa had for breakfast makes no difference. Nothing could be further from the truth, Stomach contents I am sure was a factor in determining time of death.
I think a key factor here is who this person knows, or lives with. What kind of things they may be overlooking, denying, refusing to report.
That is very possible Kickoff but I just have a feeling that they do not have a clue.
Maybe the person also refused doing voluntary DNA?
In this case, they are not establishing probable cause, they are going door to door, without a warrant.It doesn't necessarily mean they have no idea who it is. It could go either way. However, building a case, is building a case. That means developing significant probable cause to demand DNA sample.
Hi. Curious what makes you think the people he lives with or knows have no suspicions, no gut instincts or questions whatsoever, basically no clue?
Totally agree. I don't think we can rule out that they have a suspect or suspects just because there has been no arrest yet. LE can't just demand anyone they consider a suspect give a DNA sample. They need enough evidence in order to demand it. And I don't see the DNA dragnet as being contrary to them having a suspect or suspects. In fact, doing such a dragnet in a suspect's neighborhood would be a great tactic. Obviously the suspect wouldn't voluntarily give a sample. To be clear - I'm not implying anyone who refuses to give a sample could be guilty. (I feel I need to state that as we have some people on this thread that seem to misread others' comments.)
I honestly could go both ways on this - LE might be trying to gather enough evidence against a suspect to require a DNA sample or they might not have any suspects.
In this case, they are not establishing probable cause, they are going door to door, without a warrant.
If they had one particular suspect in mind, they would have to establish probable cause, go to a judge, and if he agrees, he will issue the warrant.
I do believe they have his DNA, based on MSN reports that they plan on using it to establish a facial profile, however, sometimes they use a dragnet as a bluff, meaning they have no clue who it is, but when asked to give, watch the reaction, and if that person refuses, they zero in . Nobody has to submit their DNA without a warrant, (unless arrested for a felony) So LE pressures them into it by playing the "what do you have to hide" game.
More than likely if this person is within a family, IMO - there have been issues with narcissism or abuse of some kind prior to this as well. However, denial of this over time can be strong too.