Just for a fun, let's exercise our imaginations a little here.
Just pretend for a moment that, oh let's say for example, THn told the lead investigator in Kyron's disappearance that she saw Kyron being dragged away from school into a station wagon that then sped away.
No one else saw this happen; there were no drag marks or tire marks or any other evidence whatsoever to back up this claim. In fact, no one else has even reported seeing Kyron at school that day.
Three or four days after the disappearance, when the lead investigator is asked if THn, the last person believed to have seen Kyron alive, has taken a polygraph, he replies with, "Why should I ask her to take a polygraph? I believe her." And he then proceeds, apparently, to do no further investigation.
Then four weeks later this investigator and THn start appearing together at events focusing on the problem of kidnapped children, which coincidentally is an area in which this investigator claims to be an expert who constantly complains that the government is not doing enough about the problem.
I defy anyone on here to honestly state that they would not for a moment think the situation was at best a serious conflict of interest for this investigator, and at worst, something, well, much worse.
And I totally agree, Tiffany is definitely trying to make a difference. Her latest cause: impeach Obama.
http://www.bringdavidhome.com/
Strange cause for a grieving widow to take up, IMO.
So according to her Obama is "allowing other countries to control what goes on in the US"?
What does that have to do with bringing David home? For that matter, what does it have to do with David's death at all? Hasn't Tiffany claimed over and over again that she and David were on the Mexico side?
IMO, something stinks here. Really, really bad.