Scout87
Justice for Jessica and Kara
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2016
- Messages
- 406
- Reaction score
- 269
They are beautiful angels. This is wonderful. Thank you for sharing with us. :heartbeat:
They are beautiful angels. This is wonderful. Thank you for sharing with us. :heartbeat:
Okay , It said he has never talked to ANYONE .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I generally agree with you. But, isn't it pretty serial killer of him to stash his victims in the same spot? Just so gross and had to have been somewhat calculated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They are giving this so much diligence and treating it with such respect. So many various agencies have been brought in to help over the past few days. I have so much respect for these people and the work that they do. It has got to be mentally draining. On another note, I doubt that KY will expect the FBI to have become involved in assisting this investigation. I hope he has fun with that.Stephanie Kayser was live. 2 hrs · Update from Capt Tieman on Cass County search KCTV5 News I was posting this 2 hours ago but got distracted, sorry!
I generally agree with you. But, isn't it pretty serial killer of him to stash his victims in the same spot? Just so gross and had to have been somewhat calculated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think so, that would be a separate offense completely. I haven't heard anything about the rock quarry wanting to press charges against the mushroom hunter. Which, if they do, they should also charge KY quadruple for trespassing, twice for going in there and twice for dumping his victims on their land like garbage. The police will likely investigate the land, who owns it, if there is a link somewhere to the case. There likely isn't, but they will do it to cover all their bases.Legal question: Will it be a problem that the person who found the spot was mushroom hunting in a No trespassing area therefore technically breaking the law? Is Violation of a No Trespassing area only a problem if the owner wants to pursue charges? I doubt the quarry will pursue charges on the trespasser. But I would hate to have this be some technicality that KY can skate on.
I will say that sociopaths fool MANY people. I personally know one, she has said and done some completely terrible, heartless things. Yet she is active in the church and has everyone completely fooled into thinking she is a good person. It angers me to no end.I don't think it's harsh, I always felt like his grandfather knew something was wrong. Maybe he was in deep denial but that's not an excuse.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very seriously doubt the quarry would press any charges aganist the mushroom hunter. If they did it would no doubt cause some utter chaos from the public and media. Everyone is thankful for thE mushroom hunter breaking the law.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Wow. KY sounds like an absolute . I hope he rots.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I generally agree with you. But, isn't it pretty serial killer of him to stash his victims in the same spot? Just so gross and had to have been somewhat calculated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. Honestly, I think the mushroom hunter should be given any reward money that is still being offered in these cases.
Legal question:
Will it be a problem that the person who found the spot was mushroom hunting in a No trespassing area therefore technically breaking the law? Is Violation of a No Trespassing area only a problem if the owner wants to pursue charges? I doubt the quarry will pursue charges on the trespasser. But I would hate to have this be some technicality that KY can skate on.
Criminal trespass statutes: http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/56900001401.html (scroll to the right to see more degrees)
-Even if the state pressed charges it would likely only be an infraction as a penalty
Civil trespass statute: http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/53700003401.html
-This would maybe allow for financial recovery of the property owner for damaging the property (i.e. removing valuable resources, i.e. mushrooms) if the property owner chose to pursue it. I haven't read it closely and don't know all the facts so I am not entirely sure if it would be a case or not IMO.
As far as the Rules of Evidence go, the exclusionary rule (which is the principle that illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in court, per the 4th amendment) only applies to government officials or those working under government official's authority. There is still a blanket bar for evidence that is not "reliable." So taking a hypothetical scenario, if a person broke into a house and found evidence, the defense attorneys would argue the evidence is too unreliable to be admitted (like that it could be tampered with or forged, or the witness is a thief therefore its unreliable, etc.).
IMO none of this will apply to these remains being found by the mushroom hunter. It's hard to argue that dental or DNA evidence would be unreliable in this situation. JMO.