I feel like one reason none of this is making sense is that the report WE have been told via media and LE, of "a 6 year old " running ahead" of dad and he not be able to catch him before he vanished ", stops (and theres an hour before 911 was called) does not sit right. LE has been very focused on this park however, have not confirmed rather witnesses or video saw him. That information given to us via LE has not changed.
This made me personally(initially until witnesses started being interviewed via media) think they werent able to confirm ( nor deny) him being at the park .... many people have been a bit 'unhappy ' that ( as far as WE know LE has not extended the search from beyond the 2 mile around the park ( with a very " appeasing " mention of checking your yard, etc ) and had bluntly said they do not need the public's help searching.
By now they are normally pleading for help.They are not clueless.
No huge developments have been told to us however, if you relisten to yesterdays PC between mark 7-8 the mention moms privacy and victims specialist being with her, pause, and throw in " and dad would like us to respect his privacy". Theres also this mystery person.
( IMO) Dad/video/ witness friend may have very well told LE more details by now ( like what he was doing in the park that left him distracted long enough for Maddox to vanish) and LE isnt mentioning this because it will not help with locating Maddox ( and possibly may hinder the investigation and search somehow if we use that knowledge and assume differently than what LE already are onto).
There is this missing piece and ( now after the search staying focused at the park area )I do feel like LE has it , are confident Maddox was in fact at the park , and are not going to reveal until he is found. I do not think they think Dad hurt Maddox however, there may be other charges they bring forth later .
* all just speculation based on what has transpired so far
Edit to add: excuse punctuation etc. Typing quickly via phone