Defense added three witnesses they will subpena also without Prosecution knowing that or being able to argue against them in front of the judge.
The witnesses were listed last month. It was probably no surprise to the state that the defense would pull this trick
Here are the rest of the entries. No mention there of any information contained in the recent defense filings:
10/30/2019 SUBPOENA ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF PIKE COUNTY ON TERESA PARAMETER
10/30/2019 SUBPOENA ISSUED TO S A RYAN SCHEIDERER BCI, DETECTIVE SGT ALAN LEWIS, S A JON JENKINS, GINGER LAWLESS, REBECCA BARRETT, JAMES GORE BCI, JONATHAN ROBBINS, ALLISON DESANTIS, DANA FORNEY, JULIA EVESLAGE BCI, CORNELIUS MCGRADY, STEPHFAN MCDANIELS, AND JENNY COMISFORD BCI (WILL BE SERVED BY SPECIAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY)
11/06/2019 PRECIPE FOR SUBPOENA UPON BRUCE DAILEY FILED
11/06/2019 SUBPOENA ISSUED TO BRUCE DAILEY BY PCSO
11/12/2019 SHERIFFS RETURN ON SUBPOENA -- THERESA PARMETER SERVED PERSONALLY 11/1/19
11/12/2019 JOURNAL ENTRY -- COURTROOM DECORUM ORDER -- For the protection of the rights of the parties to a fair trial and for the decorum of the within proceedings, upon the Court's own motion it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Persons in the courtroom must remain silent during all proceedings. There shall be no talking, shaking of heads in approval or disapproval of any statements, actions, rulings, testimony, or proceedings; or any other signals of approval or disapproval of the proceedings. Such displays may threaten to influence the jurors and imperil the rights of the parties. 2. No signs, banners, buttons, clothing with messages, or other distracting, disruptive, or potentially improper or prejudicial material shall be allowed in the courtroom, the courthouse, the parking lot or grounds of the courthouse, or any other place where such displays can have a prejudicial impact on the jurors. 3. The atmosphere of the courtroom shall be free from emotional outbursts or other expressions that could be caused by the nature of the evidence and arguments in this action. Any person who does not control his/her emotions (especially, for example, during the presentation and discussion of any graphic evidence) shall not be permitted to stay in the court room. 4. Counsel and parties shall not make any public statements regarding this action unless the same are made on the record in open court.
11/13/2019 DEFEDANT RITA JO NEWCOMB'S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO STATE'S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL
11/13/2019 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY VERDICT FORMS FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL
11/13/2019 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL
11/14/2019 CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE
11/14/2019 JOURNAL ENTRY -- THIS CAUSE CAME FOR STATUS CONFERENCE ON NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AT 3:30PM AT THE REQUEST OF THE STATE OF OHIO; A JURY TRIAL IS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2019 AT 8:30AM; DURING THE CONFERENCE, THE STATE OF OHIO ORALLY REQUESTED THE JURY TRIAL BE CONTINUED FOR REASONS STATED ON THE RECORD; COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT EXPRESSED THE DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO A CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, THAT BEFORE NOVEMBER 14, 2019 AT 4:00PM, THE STATE OF OHIO SHALL SERVE AND FILE A WRITTEN MOTION REQUESTING THE CONTINUANCE OF THE JURY TRIAL, SETTING FORTH ALL REASONS WHY THE STATE FEELS THAT IT NEEDS A CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, THAT ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 14, 2019 AT 4:00PM THE DEFENDANT SHALL SERVE AND FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE STATE OF OHIO'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL
11/14/2019 DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM CONTRA TO THE STATE OF OHIO'S MOTION TO CONTINUE THE JURY TRIAL SCHEDULE FOR NOVEMBER 18, 2019, WHICH IS DUE TO BE FILED BY STATE OF OHIO BY THE END OF THE BUSINESS DAY ON NOVEMBER 14, 2019 FILED COPIES FILED RETD TO COUNSEL
11/14/2019 MOTION AND MEMORANDUM TO CONTINUE JURY TRIAL SET FOR NOVEMBER 18, 2019 FILED Attorney: CANEPA, ANGELA R
https://pikecountycpcourt.org/eserv...9Jobw1xgznNJDMBDtAh4lL3ZHu8yY1c8zb8PXhP3WOCsA
@Myland can you show us where is the information about the state's case and the defense allegations you mentioned? TIA.