Jmo According to what I heard in the hearings her only charges are related to the bpvsWas FW also charged with telling people about her GJ testimony?
Jmo According to what I heard in the hearings her only charges are related to the bpvsWas FW also charged with telling people about her GJ testimony?
Was FW also charged with telling people about her GJ testimony?
In the charge of Obstruction of Justice, it says she told someone false information to hinder the apprehension of and info about the commission of crimes by the 4 Wagners.I believe that's the obstruction charge? JMO
Posted with permission but with no link. Omnibus Motion for FW.
Jmo According to what I heard in the hearings her only charges are related to the bpvs
I've never heard that, IDK. I don't think the cost would be that great, though.
Was FW also charged with telling people about her GJ testimony?
Posted with permission but with no link. Omnibus Motion for FW.
Thank you for sharing. Is it just me, or do some of the pages seem to be duplicates?
My observations:
Owen and FW trying to bring contempt charges against the Prosecution attorneys -- what a joke.
Have the authentic receipts of the purchase of the BP vests been turned over by FW and Owen to AC as she has been requesting since DAY 1? NO. I think she is legally giving them a taste of their own "withholding" medicine. Good for her.
Why was "Defendant" changed to "Mrs. Wagner?" Well of course, because the Defendant can't stand being called what she is.
It's interesting that Owen and FW are attacking (in this Motion), AC, RJ, and BCI Agent RS, 2 of whose lives were threatened, along with Sheriff CR's, by FW and her family (4 charged with murder) via a confidential information resource. And of course, that person's identity and life is in grave danger, IMO.
Kudos to AC for the smiley face to Owen in the email cancelling their 4/17 meeting. Stand tall, AC!!
All just my opinion, respectively.
Looks like page 3 is missing and page 4 is duplicated - but the gist of it is there - thank you.I may have screwed up downloading them so I may have duplicated one. I did it in a hurry.
Looks like page 3 is missing and page 4 is duplicated - but the gist of it is there - thank you.
Reading it makes me wonder if Prosecution has received the subpoenaed information from EBay regarding the receipts for the BPVs - or even more information about EBay purchases, in that time frame, by the Defendant(s)?
JMO
Also, IMO, on the first reading of the omnibus, Defendant's counsel seems to have an anxious tone; what is he afraid of? JMO
I have heard of it, but I think you need to clear it with Tricia first.
If that source is used in court against the W-4 and confirms FW did talk about her GJ testimony, can they bring news charges right then and there?No. I don't know why but I can guess why. Only a guess but I think in order to charge her for discussing her GJ Testimony the prosecution would be forced to reveal their "confidential reliable source"......The information, that she discussed her GJ Testimony WITH the 4 Wagners, comes from the "source".
If that source is used in court against the W-4 and confirms FW did talk about her GJ testimony, can they bring news charges right then and there?
I bet every worker that Fredericka has is walking on pins and needles, she thinks someone and don’t know who has been ratting the family out, I’m very surprised that they haven’t all quit......My 2 Cents......
If it's a person who is the source then that would not be enough evidence to indict. It would just be hearsay unless there was evidence to back up what the source says. In other words, you can't just take someone's word for it, there has to be something else to substantiate it.
However, if it's on a wiretap in Fred's own words, that might be quite different.
Or if the source was the one wearing the wire etc...
It's a very good question sunshine. Discussing GJ Testimony against the Judge's order---just like talking when there is a Gag Order---is Contempt of Court and Contempt actually is a crime......
Is contempt of court a crime?
Criminal contempt of court is a criminal charge which is employed to punish behavior that interferes with the proceedings or orders of a court.
Contempt of Court, Criminal - law.cornell.edu
Penalties associated with a Gag Order
If an individual under a gag order violates the restrictions imposed by the order, they can be subject to legal penalties such as fines or imprisonment.
Gag Order - Court | Laws.com
I bet every worker that Fredericka has is walking on pins and needles, she thinks someone and don’t know who has been ratting the family out, I’m very surprised that they haven’t all quit.
Here is page 3.Posted with permission but with no link. Omnibus Motion for FW.
Yes. Even if Fred might not think that one of her employees overheard the revenge/GJ conversations between the 5 of them, she still could very well suspect one or more of them gave tips to LE about suspicious ______ (fill in blank)
.....My 2 Cents.....