FloatingStar
Inactive
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
I was struck by a video of Paterno out in front of his house, sometime shortly after when he was fired. The supportive crowd was there praising Paterno and his wife.
One of Paterno's statements to the crowd was to "pray for the victims." To me this is a very interesting admission that he knew of, was sure of, the fact that there were multiple victims. Why else would he say something like that?
While there are still Penn State freakazoids who imply that the evidence against Sandusky is fabricated, Paterno himself is willing to characterize Sandusky as guilty? This means that the slime lawyer whiney-boys who paint Sandusksy as a victim (Cohen & Gershman) would have to attack Paterno for biasing the public. And Paterno's voice biases the public on a par with big-time news organizations.
Paterno and his wife, standing outside their house and confirming definitely that there were multiple victims, means that somehow they have been fully informed and believe in the verity of the case against Sandusky. The burden then, seems like it is on Paterno to say when in his own mind Sandusky was confirmed to be a child abuser. But wait, I get the slight intuition that it will be a job for his PR firm.
One of Paterno's statements to the crowd was to "pray for the victims." To me this is a very interesting admission that he knew of, was sure of, the fact that there were multiple victims. Why else would he say something like that?
While there are still Penn State freakazoids who imply that the evidence against Sandusky is fabricated, Paterno himself is willing to characterize Sandusky as guilty? This means that the slime lawyer whiney-boys who paint Sandusksy as a victim (Cohen & Gershman) would have to attack Paterno for biasing the public. And Paterno's voice biases the public on a par with big-time news organizations.
Paterno and his wife, standing outside their house and confirming definitely that there were multiple victims, means that somehow they have been fully informed and believe in the verity of the case against Sandusky. The burden then, seems like it is on Paterno to say when in his own mind Sandusky was confirmed to be a child abuser. But wait, I get the slight intuition that it will be a job for his PR firm.