I'm still trying to wrap my head around these items, sourced here:
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49383897.html
"I've tried to keep the thought of somebody grabbing her out of my mind," says her mother, Melissa Baum.
She says Lindsey argued with her brother on her way to a friend's house Friday night. She talked to her friend for a bit, then started for home as darkness fell.
In the above quote, there is no mention of other friends. Just, "that she [LB] talked to her friend for a bit". Not plural.
Friend. MB did not say LB walked toward home with <insert name here>.
Continue reading for why I am highlighting this point.
The friend's father, Scott Williams, said he asked Lindsey to go home before it got too dark. "She was here 10, 15 minutes, and then, you know, we said, 'You should probably get going before it gets dark,' and that was the last we heard of her," he said.
In the above quote, SW states, "asked Lindsey to go". Also, no mention of any other friends involved in the scene.
But then we have this:
Witnesses say Lindsey seemed normal as she headed out around 9:15. Another friend even walked her part of the way, but Lindsey never showed up at her home.
We may assume "
witnesses" to be KK, SW and MK, given the phrase: "headed out". I interpret that as meaning, 'just leaving'. So it stands to reason, the "
witnesses" are the house occupants.
But .... what about the "
another friend" item?
When did this [an]other friend appear? Who is the friend? Age? Did SW also tell the friend to go home? Was the friend an adult? No mention of the other friend in previous paragraphs.
This is one of a few key early issues in this case. I know this has been hashed and re-hashed, and shrugged off as mistaken reporting but I do not read it as such.
If there were many more principals involved in that scene, I would understand a mixup or confusion in reporting.
But the only principals inside MK's house that evening, we have:
- KK
- SW
- MK
- LB
- MK's siblings? (Were any of them present, in first-person? Were they in their bedrooms? Unknown, I did not locate a report regarding MK's siblings whereabouts for that evening).
Which one of those principals [minus LB, of course] told a reporter that "another friend even walked her part of the way" ?
Let's go to the next scene, outside of MK's house:
http://www.komonews.com/news/49891642.html
Lindsey was last seen at the corner of 6th and Maple heading home from her friend's house at about 9:15 p.m last Friday.
Again no mention of "walking with someone".
Before that 04/03/2009 news item was published, the second witness had already come forward:
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49651607.html
On Wednesday a second person came forward to report having seen Lindsey Baum on Friday night as she walked home along Maple Street from a friend's house
I did not locate a story on that web site that reported on a 'first witness'. Sloppy reporting, that.
The relevant point is that the 6th Street west corner is very close to MK's house. Either KK, SW, MK or an MK sibling walked LB out their door, possibly to the 6th St. west corner and then subsequent witness(es) saw LB on or after that corner.
... OR ...
Someone from MK's house that evening lied to the reporter (or police?) about what really occured.
Why did the story change and, just as important, why did the report include "another friend"?