dog.gone.cute
Kyron Horman - Missing Since 6-4-10
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 15,653
- Reaction score
- 1,949
I think they wanted to keep Vic's wife off the stand for a few reasons.
One, someone tells you to throw an illegal weapon into the swamp because it might 'have a body on it'? Kind of immoral and irresponsible action and she would have to defend it, on the stand.
Two, she was hubby's alibi. And I don't think they state wanted the defense to get the chance to attack his alibi by asking all kinds of scandalous questions, about past crimes, etc.
So they might have been hiding some things, but not necessarily hiding anything about the discarded weapon.
:seeya: These are some great points. BBM: Bingo !
JMO but I still find it puzzling why the person who actually disposed of the "alleged murder weapon" did not testify.
So is it possible that VD's wife was not called to testify because she could have opened up a can :worms: for both the State and defense?
JMO but obviously, she knew all the perps/defendant and she obviously knew this bunch were not "choir boys" ...
So if she testified for the State, her testimony could have been detrimental to the State - especially if she said something about the State's "star witness" ? Yes, JA and the State admitted he was a felon, con., etc. ... But could she have said "something" that they did not want brought up? And naturally, the Defense would not have wanted her because no telling what she would have revealed about ZA.
JMO but the State presented its very carefully and very cautiously ...
:moo: