Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 35

[deedee21]

Ok! Deep breath! JM and Det F won! JA will pay for murdering Travis. AZ lawyer has explained to us many times that JA will spend the rest of her life in prison. Second victory for JM and DF..Travis is a normal guy! Shock! Likes women, sex and a little *advertiser censored*! I never thought she would get DP so I am very pleased that TA's reputation is restored.

I feel the same way. I do hope she gets the death penalty though. She deserves it. Im sure she will make the evening news from time to time.

 

[samspace070]

I read this on twitter the other day and when asked where that came out they said in JVM's book. Which is kind of awesome. And completely logical. Why WOULD Jodi be giving someone magazines unless it was to pass notes? If Juan hadn't been there that day he might never have gotten that delicious piece of evidence. Just makes you wonder how many she was able to get out before she was caught.

That is what I have been wondering MeeBee. I put nothing past this sly snake of a criminal. Remember when she tried to represent herself in the first trial? She only did it for four or five days and when she came back in and said she needed help that is when she produced those forged letters. Everytime this woman says she wants to represent herself some new damaging evidence suddenly comes to the attention of the defense. While she is representing herself she gets extra priviledges on the phone and visitors. I think that is when she gets people to lie for her and tells them what to say. Do you think that is possible too?:thinking:

 

[MeeBee]

@TrialDiariesJ: Here's a pic of Damien Ashdown (Cheryl Evans) #jodiarias http://t.co/SPjM0ZDi8e

 

[Caylee Advocate]

Thanks Ziggy.

That is great news to hear. This helps so much. The other courtroom tweeters seldom provide this important information to us. We understand its just your opinion and that is exactly what we need.

Its so great to get this opinion. It helps us tremendously. If we all were able to watch the trial this is exactly the kind of thing we would be looking for. Since we cannot see it we rely on others to give it to us and they seldom provide it to us. So THANK YOU.

Your our "boots on the ground".

Am I imagining too much if I am picturing a "platinum blonde gal" (as Watt would say...LOL) with army boots on, went storming into the courtroom this morning with the courtroom clerk escorting her right to a prime seat behind some of JA's family members, and saying "Excuse me but you are going to have to scoot over a little because Justice has arrived and we are here for Travis now!!!" :websleuther:

It's true, I think. I found the pic so it has to be true right? J/K Ziggy!!

 

[ziggy]

Thanks Ziggy.

That is great news to hear. This helps so much. The other courtroom tweeters seldom provide this important information to us. We understand its just your opinion and that is exactly what we need.

Its so great to get this opinion. It helps us tremendously. If we all were able to watch the trial this is exactly the kind of thing we would be looking for. Since we cannot see it we rely on others to give it to us and they seldom provide it to us. So THANK YOU.

Your our "boots on the ground".

Am I imagining too much if I am picturing a "platinum blonde gal" (as Watt would say...LOL) with army boots on, went storming into the courtroom this morning with the courtroom clerk escorting her right to a prime seat behind some of JA's family members, and saying "Excuse me but you are going to have to scoot over a little because Justice has arrived and we are here for Travis now!!!" :websleuther:

Close - I had on boots, but sexy black pointy toe, spikey heel zip up to the knee in stretchy fabric with a leather strip up the side. They are heels but super comfortable. Platinum blonde, bright royal blue cardigan with starched white collared shirt underneath, black skirt with feminine layer pattern in the front, black hose, black boots, black frame Calvin Klein glasses, a briefcase the guard made fun of as he pretended to struggle with its weight at security - he said, "you're one strong lady" and I just laughed and slung it over my shoulder. I've been there before but I usually wear black or gray. I think the bright blue stuck out.

I have some leather lace up the front boots. Guess I'll wear those with my salmon shirt and fabric/leather mix blazer on Wed. Or maybe I should try to look friendlier. I don't have friendly clothes. And my daughter says I'm too old to wear animal print.

 

[Amster]

During the trial, did the jury get to read what JA wrote in that magazine? I thought Sherry didn't allow it, but I can't remember. I know Nurmi and JW fought like rabid dogs to keep that info out.

 

[MeeBee]

That is what I have been wondering MeeBee. I put nothing past this sly snake of a criminal. Remember when she tried to represent herself in the first trial? She only did it for four or five days and when she came back in and said she needed help that is when she produced those forged letters. Everytime this woman says she wants to represent herself some new damaging evidence suddenly comes to the attention of the defense. While she is representing herself she gets extra priviledges on the phone and visitors. I think that is when she gets people to lie for her and tells them what to say. Do you think that is possible too?:thinking:

Absolutely!

By the way, that same woman who ran out of the jail when the guards took the magazines is the same woman who ran out of the court room whenever Juan pulled the magazine codes out.

Just kind of funny.

 

[MeeBee]

During the trial, did the jury get to read what JA wrote in that magazine? I thought Sherry didn't allow it, but I can't remember. I know Nurmi and JW fought like rabid dogs to keep that info out.

No it came in during the trial while Jodi was on the stand and has come in during this retrial while Geffner was on the stand.

 

[Caylee Advocate]

Good idea! Wasn't he the one who tweeted about the camera guy supplying candy? He seemed to appreciate them.

I am not sure who was providing them, but he tweets about it often.

 

[deedee21]

I read this on twitter the other day and when asked where that cam out they said in JVM's book. Which is kind of awesome. And completely logical. Why WOULD Jodi be giving someone magazines unless it was to pass notes? If Juan hadn't been there that day he might never have gotten that delicious piece of evidence. Just makes you wonder how many she was able to get out before she was caught.

I laughed out load at this. It shows how manipulating and calculating she is. It adds validity to anything that might otherwise be considered hersay.

 

[Amster]

No it came in during the trial while Jodi was on the stand and has come in during this retrial while Geffner was on the stand.

Thanks....so, what she wrote was revealed during this retrial?

 

[MeeBee]

Thanks....so, what she wrote was revealed during this retrial?

Yes it has, he asked Geffner about it and put the magazines and the messages in order on the projector, same as he did first trial.

 

[Amster]

Yes it has, he asked Geffner about it and put the magazines and the messages in order on the projector, same as he did first trial.

Thanks! I totally missed it...

 

[daisydomino]

Are salmon and coral close to being the same color or should I go shopping?

I think everything from indigo to coral counts as salmon. Some shades of green and yellow, if I recall correctly. But you better go shopping, just in case. ;-)

This is fun. Thank you ziggy.

 

[Caylee Advocate]

Close - I had on boots, but sexy black pointy toe, spikey heel zip up to the knee in stretchy fabric with a leather strip up the side. They are heels but super comfortable. Platinum blonde, bright royal blue cardigan with starched white collared shirt underneath, black skirt with feminine layer pattern in the front, black hose, black boots, black frame Calvin Klein glasses, a briefcase the guard made fun of as he pretended to struggle with its weight at security - he said, "you're one strong lady" and I just laughed and slung it over my shoulder. I've been there before but I usually wear black or gray. I think the bright blue stuck out.

I have some leather lace up the front boots. Guess I'll wear those with my salmon shirt and fabric/leather mix blazer on Wed. Or maybe I should try to look friendlier. I don't have friendly clothes. And my daughter says I'm too old to wear animal print.

ChaCha wears it and she is no spring chicken. :gaah:

 

[AZlawyer]

AZL in case you're still around... The reason I was confused over the additional week or two of F & Geff testimony is that I thought during one of the arguments over precluding DeMarte that the DT said something like, "Well fine if you're going to let her testify then you have to let us recall and F & Geff." Maybe my recollection of that is wrong, but I got the impression it needed her approval, which made me think it was an extra round that they really had no right to. Or maybe I'm thinking of the above but replace F & Geff and DeMarte with BN & Sue and Smith. Does that ring any bells, or have I totally lost it?

I recall that convo and it was when the DT was trying to preclude Dr.DM when Nurmi said it.

It is not an extra round. But it may be that they were pointing out that they would have to drag these people back from California or wherever and they were super-busy so it would no doubt extend the trial by a couple of weeks and blah blah blah.

But she really does have to let them do rebuttal. And repeating what's already been said is basically the point of rebuttal, e.g.:

JW: Good morning.

Dr. Hired Gunn (hypothetical witness name, no connection to any actual witness): Good morning.

JW: Do you recall, Dr. Gunn, when you were here last, you testified blah blah blah?

Dr. Gunn: I do.

JW: In your absence, some upstart sat here and said halb halb halb, which is the exact opposite of what you said, would you agree?

Dr. Gunn: Indeed.

JW: And she said the reason for her opinion was XYZ, plus common sense and evidence. Now that you have heard that information, have you changed your opinion?

Dr. Gunn: No, I am not paid to change my opinion.

JW: kthxbai

Thanks....so, what she wrote was revealed during this retrial?

Yes.

 

[ziggy]

That's really good to hear. Thanks. Have any sense of how the jury's doing? Burned out, still hanging in, looking perky?

Jury looks pretty good. I haven't noticed one that I thought was drifting off or falling asleep. A few suspected doodlers but hey, who could blame them.

BTW they didn't take many notes on today's testimony re: the *advertiser censored*. I suspect there are several jurors who completely understand how desperately grasping at straws this *advertiser censored* "evidence" is just based on their own computer knowledge. I mean, I know what they are talking about and I'm no IT expert.

Besides, what browser did TA normally use? Mozilla frequently or IE most of the time? That would be interesting to know.

Those sneaky links and banner ads move up and down with a scroll sometimes and you click on them by mistake and then BAM, there is a flash player video on a side banner of some *advertiser censored* action and it is on a loop so it just keeps going. I don't live on the edge, so I'm pretty sure this has happened to a juror or two. Does that then go into Mozilla's history.dat? Yeah probably, because you clicked and got the banner ad with the video in it.

I don't like Mozilla. I downloaded it a few months ago and it took over all of my icons and everything. I didn't like how intrusive it was so removed it.

I actually went into my computer registry and removed a malware program that hijacked Google Chrome. It was Vostran. That bugger was not detected by any of my malware or anti-virus programs but I forgot I had Spybot. Then I got it again!!! I ran the Spybot and it detected it and about 6 other trojans and got rid of them. I got it downloading a free font. FONT. not *advertiser censored*.

 

[MeeBee]

It is not an extra round. But it may be that they were pointing out that they would have to drag these people back from California or wherever and they were super-busy so it would no doubt extend the trial by a couple of weeks and blah blah blah.

But she really does have to let them do rebuttal. And repeating what's already been said is basically the point of rebuttal, e.g.:

JW: Good morning.

Dr. Hired Gunn (hypothetical witness name, no connection to any actual witness): Good morning.

JW: Do you recall, Dr. Gunn, when you were here last, you testified blah blah blah?

Dr. Gunn: I do.

JW: In your absence, some upstart sat here and said halb halb halb, which is the exact opposite of what you said, would you agree?

Dr. Gunn: Indeed.

JW: And she said the reason for her opinion was XYZ, plus common sense and evidence. Now that you have heard that information, have you changed your opinion?

Dr. Gunn: No, I am not paid to change my opinion.

JW: kthxbai



Yes.

LOL!

Now stretch this out over four days and it's pretty good.

 

[deedee21]

I read this on twitter the other day and when asked where that came out they said in JVM's book. Which is kind of awesome. And completely logical. Why WOULD Jodi be giving someone magazines unless it was to pass notes? If Juan hadn't been there that day he might never have gotten that delicious piece of evidence. Just makes you wonder how many she was able to get out before she was caught.

It would be great if someone can post that part of the trial here. For laughs.

 

[AZlawyer]

Jury looks pretty good. I haven't noticed one that I thought was drifting off or falling asleep. A few suspected doodlers but hey, who could blame them.

BTW they didn't take many notes on today's testimony re: the *advertiser censored*. I suspect there are several jurors who completely understand how desperately grasping at straws this *advertiser censored* "evidence" is just based on their own computer knowledge. I mean, I know what they are talking about and I'm no IT expert.

Besides, what browser did TA normally use? Mozilla frequently or IE most of the time? That would be interesting to know.

Those sneaky links and banner ads move up and down with a scroll sometimes and you click on them by mistake and then BAM, there is a flash player video on a side banner of some *advertiser censored* action and it is on a loop so it just keeps going. I don't live on the edge, so I'm pretty sure this has happened to a juror or two. Does that then go into Mozilla's history.dat? Yeah probably, because you clicked and got the banner ad with the video in it.

I don't like Mozilla. I downloaded it a few months ago and it took over all of my icons and everything. I didn't like how intrusive it was so removed it.

I actually went into my computer registry and removed a malware program that hijacked Google Chrome. It was Vostran. That bugger was not detected by any of my malware or anti-virus programs but I forgot I had Spybot. Then I got it again!!! I ran the Spybot and it detected it and about 6 other trojans and got rid of them. I got it downloading a free font. FONT. not *advertiser censored*.

A font made of pictures of naked people, I assume?