That is exactly what I thought when I saw that.Since there’s a door to the outside in the gun room, he could have quickly gone in there
The back of Paul's head is gone. Why would he turn him over.? There would be no reason. He is telling lies at to why he messed with Paul's phone. A phone that was just used to video a dog. Thank God it was already sent.
Thanks for this summary, Seattle1!
The real threat was finished with his work hmmm.The back of Paul's head is gone. Why would he turn him over.? There would be no reason. He is telling lies at to why he messed with Paul's phone. A phone that was just used to video a dog. Thank God it was already sent.
He can't say "I dug it out of his pocket cause I wanted to look inside it."
So he created a scenario of him turning Paul over and the phone just happen to "pop" out. (And no way is that phone just going to pop out of some pocket).
There could be a murderer on the lose and he decides to check out his son's phone. Ugh! What a liar.
so which clothes did SLED collect? Clothes from the house when Ms Rutland indicated after she said SLED was in the house OR did the attorney backtrack and she replied they took all of his clothes "shirt top and shoes" meaning the clothes he was currently wearing...t shirt, shorts tennis shoes????Man that shirt is CLEAN. Also, June in the south is HUMID (as testified by LE yesterday), so humid it can be miserable...that shirt is surprisingly DRY. MOO.
"I went to check on my mom and dad, I knew Maggie had gone to the kennel, I went to my mom's for just a while. I tried texting Maggie, no response. When I got back, nobody was there, drove up and saw and called."
The back of Paul's head is gone. Why would he turn him over.? There would be no reason. He is telling lies at to why he messed with Paul's phone. A phone that was just used to video a dog. Thank God it was already sent.
He can't say "I dug it out of his pocket cause I wanted to look inside it."
So he created a scenario of him turning Paul over and the phone just happen to "pop" out. (And no way is that phone just going to pop out of some pocket).
There could be a murderer on the lose and he decides to check out his son's phone. Ugh! What a liar.
Yep! How many times did the driver/detective wipe off his face and forhead? He was dripping.Man that shirt is CLEAN. Also, June in the south is HUMID (as testified by LE yesterday), so humid it can be miserable...that shirt is surprisingly DRY. MOO.
I am a lifelong learner. Trial and WS to name a few are so informative and I love it!Thanks to this trial I now know what 300 blackout is.
And... it has nothin to do with power failures, loss of memory, nor window curtains.
IMO, the shirt that tested positive for human blood spatter was an undershirt located in the laundry inside the house.so which clothes did SLED collect? Clothes from the house when Ms Rutland indicated after she said SLED was in the house OR did the attorney backtrack and she replied they took all of his clothes "shirt top and shoes" meaning the clothes he was currently wearing...t shirt, shorts tennis shoes????
Yup perked my ears up as well.Interesting to note that they recovered a rifle with night vision scope.