I try to keep an open mind and see why others feel there are possible alternate theories, especially when a person stops and thinks about an alternate theory could be something so simple as others may feel that WH is not the sole person responsible. For instance, I don't necessarily feel WH is innocent; however, I do tend to think at times others may have played a role in AJ's demise. Whether it be, for example, lying to police and/or maybe not necessarily lying but not telling the entire story of how things went down, maybe not being truthful about when the last time was that they saw AJ, and my list could go on and on. WH's past criminal history speaks for itself, that is a given and nothing anyone can deny. Is his criminal past enough to convince me that he is the sole person responsible for AJ's demise? Nope, IMO it does not. It does though show what he is capable of and that he could very well indeed be the *only* person responsible, but we do not know enough facts IMO to make that call at this point. As a matter of fact (no pun intended), what *Facts* do we actually know in regards to AJ's demise? That her body was found. That WH is in jail, we do know what his charges are, but we do not know exactly how those charges all came about. Sure, we gained a few bits and pieces from MSM of what two witnesses said in court, but IMO not near enough to tell the whole story of the sequence of events prior to and immediately after AJ's disappearance. We have been told basically nothing from LE, which IMO is understandable, but with so little information being given, we really don't know many *Facts* of what actually happened. Even regarding the phone pings, LE themselves IIRC have not said anything about phone pings; we have a person who lives near the pond in IOW who *said* LE told him something about phone pings. So do we take this as a fact because this person said so? I don't. Maybe it's true, maybe it's not, until LE says it, I'm not taking it as it's etched in stone. I'm sure there are some other known *Facts* that I've overlooked (that we have been told) but IMO, regardless, not enough for me to already be convinced of who is guilty and who is not.
IMO, while some people on one side of the fence may feel it's irrelevant that others want to talk about their alternate theories and/or possibilities of what could have happened, there are also people on the other side who feel there could be other theories as to what happened.
JMO, until someone is actually charged and found guilty of murdering AJ, I am not ruling anything out. I personally cannot jump on a bandwagon that WH is "the" only person responsible for AJ's demise; not with such few facts even yet known.