MimosaMornings
Well- Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2018
- Messages
- 7,916
- Reaction score
- 61,757
Has anyone asked the father on FB for an update?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His updates aren't about details of the investigation, but more like general appeals for information.Has anyone asked the father on FB for an update?
Sure, but she is a child . So if this is a love interest I would suggest he bring her home .Assuming that she ran away and was not abducted, could her motive for running away be that she is in love?
MOO
The car may not have a registered address. It could have stolen plates or be registered to a fake name and a vacant field. It could be a rental car obtained with false information. MOOThen LE should have a make and model and a license plate of the car too. Therefore, also the name of the registered owner and an address.
So, are LE being slow or just not releasing any updates? Because her Dad hasn't seemed to update the public much either.
Has the car been found? Was it at the registered address? Was it abandoned? Was the owner questioned?
The car may not have a registered address. It could have stolen plates or be registered to a fake name and a vacant field. It could be a rental car obtained with false information. MOO
1000% agreeExactly, and this is what the basis of the investigation should be. Who and why. We really do need some LE or family updates now to draw a line under what has been investigated already, what is a dead end and a red herring. The longer the silence lasts, the more people will lose interest. Cases like this always need some forward movement, however small.
At 16 you can do just about anything with a parent's consent, quit school, get married. Perhaps her mom consented to something her dad knows nothing about.Sure, but she is a child . So if this is a love interest I would suggest he bring her home .
Moo
The account is still active, only her old posts have been privated in the past few hours. Early on her father changed her profile and background pics to reflect that she was missing. It's likely that the family doesn't want strangers to scrutinize every detail of their lives.That's interesting, Lexi's Facebook account has been changed to 'private' since yesterday. So now no-one can see any previous posts or anything about her that may have helped the investigation.
I wonder who has her Facebook password apart from her? Maybe her father?
Hmmm, curious.
The account is still active, only her old posts have been privated in the past few hours. Early on her father changed her profile and background pics to reflect that she was missing. It's likely that the family doesn't want strangers to scrutinize every detail of their lives.
ETA: They might be reading here.
In DC's interview, he tells us the cook described Alexis leaving the restaurant and "walking towards a black, fancy car with dark-tinted windows" and DC adds, "At that point, that's panic, so we immediately call the police..."
The cook also told DC he didn't know if she entered the car.
We know from the interview with DC that it was unusual for Alexis to have left the restaurant through the back door, and alone, as the cook stated "we normally go out the front door, all together as a team".
I find it odd the cook is unable to say whether or not Alexis entered the vehicle he allegedly saw her approach. He also doesn't mention if he saw her speak with the driver or passenger.
The cook witnessed her unusual behaviour: leaving the restaurant alone, instead of "all together as a team"; going out the back door, when staff "normally go out the front door"; and approaching a vehicle, seemingly unfamiliar to the cook.
All this, plus it was late at night, and Alexis is only 16.
What the cook described caused DC to immediately call the police; but the cook was apparently unperturbed by what he witnessed the night Alexis disappeared, continued with his regular activities, and presumably left the restaurant without first checking if Alexis was still out the back before the doors were locked for the night.
From concern for Alexis's safety, or simply from curiosity, if I were the cook, I would have watched to see what transpired, no matter how busy I may have been.
He likely thought it was a member of her family picking her up? He would have no reason to suspect foul play, especially if Alexis wasn't showing any signs of distress. Cooks are moving a mile a minute; I'm surprised they obtained as much data from him as they did.In DC's interview, he tells us the cook described Alexis leaving the restaurant and "walking towards a black, fancy car with dark-tinted windows" and DC adds, "At that point, that's panic, so we immediately call the police..."
The cook also told DC he didn't know if she entered the car.
We know from the interview with DC that it was unusual for Alexis to have left the restaurant through the back door, and alone, as the cook stated "we normally go out the front door, all together as a team".
I find it odd the cook is unable to say whether or not Alexis entered the vehicle he allegedly saw her approach. He also doesn't mention if he saw her speak with the driver or passenger.
The cook witnessed her unusual behaviour: leaving the restaurant alone, instead of "all together as a team"; going out the back door, when staff "normally go out the front door"; and approaching a vehicle, seemingly unfamiliar to the cook.
All this, plus it was late at night, and Alexis is only 16.
What the cook described caused DC to immediately call the police; but the cook was apparently unperturbed by what he witnessed the night Alexis disappeared, continued with his regular activities, and presumably left the restaurant without first checking if Alexis was still out the back before the doors were locked for the night.
From concern for Alexis's safety, or simply from curiosity, if I were the cook, I would have watched to see what transpired, no matter how busy I may have been.
In DC's interview, he tells us the cook described Alexis leaving the restaurant and "walking towards a black, fancy car with dark-tinted windows" and DC adds, "At that point, that's panic, so we immediately call the police..."
The cook also told DC he didn't know if she entered the car.
We know from the interview with DC that it was unusual for Alexis to have left the restaurant through the back door, and alone, as the cook stated "we normally go out the front door, all together as a team".
I find it odd the cook is unable to say whether or not Alexis entered the vehicle he allegedly saw her approach. He also doesn't mention if he saw her speak with the driver or passenger.
The cook witnessed her unusual behaviour: leaving the restaurant alone, instead of "all together as a team"; going out the back door, when staff "normally go out the front door"; and approaching a vehicle, seemingly unfamiliar to the cook.
All this, plus it was late at night, and Alexis is only 16.
What the cook described caused DC to immediately call the police; but the cook was apparently unperturbed by what he witnessed the night Alexis disappeared, continued with his regular activities, and presumably left the restaurant without first checking if Alexis was still out the back before the doors were locked for the night.
From concern for Alexis's safety, or simply from curiosity, if I were the cook, I would have watched to see what transpired, no matter how busy I may have been.
In DC's interview, he tells us the cook described Alexis leaving the restaurant and "walking towards a black, fancy car with dark-tinted windows" and DC adds, "At that point, that's panic, so we immediately call the police..."
The cook also told DC he didn't know if she entered the car.
We know from the interview with DC that it was unusual for Alexis to have left the restaurant through the back door, and alone, as the cook stated "we normally go out the front door, all together as a team".
I find it odd the cook is unable to say whether or not Alexis entered the vehicle he allegedly saw her approach. He also doesn't mention if he saw her speak with the driver or passenger.
The cook witnessed her unusual behaviour: leaving the restaurant alone, instead of "all together as a team"; going out the back door, when staff "normally go out the front door"; and approaching a vehicle, seemingly unfamiliar to the cook.
All this, plus it was late at night, and Alexis is only 16.
What the cook described caused DC to immediately call the police; but the cook was apparently unperturbed by what he witnessed the night Alexis disappeared, continued with his regular activities, and presumably left the restaurant without first checking if Alexis was still out the back before the doors were locked for the night.
From concern for Alexis's safety, or simply from curiosity, if I were the cook, I would have watched to see what transpired, no matter how busy I may have been.
It does sound kind of sinister, the way you have presented it, but DC's telling is already the second version, and at least one week later. It could be, for all we know, far more mundane than that. The problem is that we have no idea since DC talked to the cook first and the police didn't visit BoomerJacks until two days later. A lot of things can change. Memories can shift.
I point this out not to blame LE too hard but I feel that this cook's memory or recollection might have already been distorted by DC asking him first instead of LE. I hope LE has already interviewed the cook and corroborated whatever parts of the story possible (like the car pulling up etc.)