Her (his/their) own choosing according to evidence disclosed during this trial:
She admitted under cross examination that the trust were buying her a house in early 2017 (child ff was born late 2017) but she refused to sign the sale contracts at the last minute. At the time she claimed her backing out was because of her "career progression", but in court she said it was because she wanted to live in the countryside.
Neither makes any sense - once the house was hers she could have sold it and bought some where rural or rented it out.
IMO she just does stuff to thumb her nose at everyone else (family, convention, societal conventions, SS, authority in general), regardless of whether it impacts her negatively or not.
It's reminds me of a family member of mine who was diagnosed with oppositional defiance disorder. Behavior and personality disorders aren't mental illnesses - some people just behave in ways that make their lives harder, while blaming everyone else for whatever happens.