Blue Jackets fan
New Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2011
- Messages
- 1,124
- Reaction score
- 0
I would give him a A-. He has so far done a pretty job even though the defense lawyers been trying to courtroom into a three ring circus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An A for the way he is doing it, and an A for effort, but not so good for moving it out of Orlando. The 8 week separation from family seems to be the biggest stumbling block,they are going to severely limit the diversity of this Jury.
HHJP isn't the one who wanted it moved out of Orlando!
As far as being lenient on the hardship clause 8 weeks of sequestering outside the area poses some distinct differences than a week close to home. MOO
I think he is fantastic. Can the public nominate a Supreme Court Justice?
No, I know it was Baez :banghead: but he should have just refused. By the end of this Jury selection JB is going to wish he had.
I didn't say he is lenient on the hardship folks, he is being very kind, but the hardships are what makes this so difficult. It would not be such a hardship if the Jury came from OC.
I think he's doing a good job. He seems to be a tad lenient on the hardship angle tho - not that I'm one to judge. When I was called to jury duty last year the judge could care less if anyone was caring for an elderly parent, or if you had small kids, or if you ran your own business....the only way you got excused was a language barrier, or chemo.
eta:
I was really impressed at the way he handled the contempt of court guy. Goes to show you he means business.
But they would still be sequestered so it does not matter where they come from....they still could not go home at night, watch the news, go on the internet so they would be put up in a hotel and they would stay there. Hardship would be the same. jmo
I voted B. I CANNOT fathom why Casey is not shackled and in jail garb.