BlueCrab said:
Thus, I'm more of the opinion that JonBenet's head and upper torso could have been propped up against the headboard by tethering the bound arms to the headboard or an overhead object while the rest of the body, from the waist down, remained horizontal on the bed. It would have been a classic position for erotic asphyxiation to have taken place which, IMO, did occur in this case. The bed being used would have been in one of the second floor bedrooms.
In this theory, after accidentally asphyxiating JonBenet, or torturing her with a stun gun and purposely asphyxiating her, the perp would have likely obscenely posed the dead body, probably with the stick tied on the end of the 17" long cord from the neck ligature inserted into the vagina. This would replicate what terrorists are expected to do. John Ramsey, upon discovering the grotesque scene very early in the morning, would have cut her down immediately, altered the crime scene, relocated the body to the basement, and established a plan to coverup what really happened.
BlueCrab
BlueCrab,
Thanks for your remarks. Well I assume most of the IDI and the Lou Smit protagonists already think it is in the Sexual Monster category.
I was not thinking along the lines of a bondage scenario, but more for an explanation as to why her arms should be above her head. A conventional scenario would have her arms behind her back, tied in front or at her side.
If her arms above her head predate her death then this may have some signifigance beyond the obvious, similar to the pineapple and underwear evidence ?
So applying Occam's principle, originally I considered that JonBenet's arms may have adopted that position as a psychological response to a sexual assault, this is not uncommon in victims.
If she had screamed or resisted her assailant may have placed a pillow over her face and suffocated her. Or she may have been lying face down onto the bed. Thus leaving her arms outstretched.
So although I used the word "outstretched" I had thought of her arms parallel above her head, either open or closed, tethered but possibly not tied in our sense, since victim restraint may have been implicitly understood as part of a game or prior sexual abuse.
The theory you outline above is consistent and possibly one that could be carried out by an experienced predatory sexual offender. The ritual asphyxiation, head trauma, stun gun torture, sexual assault, and probable posing are not the hallmarks of a neophyte. This could be the profile of a male, with an estimated age range from late teens through to mid Thirties.
For those that discount the use of a stun gun, the marks still need to be explained, however applied, JonBenet would still have experienced intense pain!