Sounds like "knock out" game, even though articles don't call it that.
And that same judge had no problem with 10 year jail sentence for a juvenile offender.
So, what gives?
Does she really think that someone from a privileged background deserves treatment instead of jail becaue they are a victim of "affluenza?"
And that same judge had no problem with 10 year jail sentence for a juvenile offender.
So, what gives?
Does she really think that someone from a privileged background deserves treatment instead of jail becaue they are a victim of "affluenza?"