I agree... people keep wanting to bring it up, but I don't see why anyone actually believes it. I mean first it's the 30 minute staring contest, then hours to shop for a specific item. Please... this is just one more reason I can't imagine anyone else hurt her. The more lies he tells, the more we might "feel bad" for him or lose focus on AJ.
:goodpost::goodpost::goodpost:
I'm going to be careful from here on out. Don't expect many posts from me. This will be LONG, but check this out if you felt you have been following my train of thought.
I think there is a lot of talking in circles going on because the info in the interview has been around and repeated so often that it feels like fact. I implore you all to revisit what was really said, specifically, by Wesley early on. It has been a month since this interview took place.
A lot has come out, and
still so many of the things being discussed in depth (in general - not calling anyone out at all) have absolutely no credibility and no visible impact to begin with.
Go back through the interview. Think about the
facts and not what WH has said. At this point, we have
no reason to believe they met at the gas station. We have
no idea when WH dropped the car off at the house. 6am before anyone woke up? 9am while AJ was asleep? Noon while she was up and doing chores? We have
no reason to believe AJ texted him asking for money. We have
no reason to believe she intended to buy a GoPro. We have
no reason to believe Wesley has Googled one. We have
no reason to believe one was involved in any way. So,
why are we seriously debating whether or not he spent time on Google? WH is a drug user and very clearly a habitual liar. Don't trust anything with no other confirmation.
We need to go back to the time when AJ went missing. I think we should see what WH had to say about it before he realized he was the main suspect. Here's what I think we need to be mulling over: If little/none of that afternoon happened as he described, why did he choose to tell this story the way he did? If he was responsible, calling into this interview to "clear things up" was his chance to give us the detailed story that he felt would explain his actions. He was describing
to the minute what time these things happened, when he later can't even seem to remember what day major events occurred on. If he’s going out of his way to make up this timeline, I am inclined to think he is trying to cover his tracks.
We really don’t know what happened between 7:00am (when her younger sister says she was indeed awake and inside the home) to 2:30pm (when her sister returned from school and she wasn't there). We only know what Wesley wants us to think happened. What really went on that afternoon is hidden somewhere in his pre-planned timeline.
He want us to think she borrowed money, when there is no indication that she did. He wants us to think she was being followed by a white car, because the red truck and the white car were both spotted at that house in the afternoon. He wants us to think he left work at 12:53am. He wants us to think this was his lunch break and he was late to return.
Why does he want us to think those things? What really happened that he can be trying to cover up and account for?
I invite you to re-examine his timeline of events from the afternoon she went missing. I've cleaned up the rhetoric so it is understandable and does not include useless mumbling. What really happened from 7:30am - 2:00pm?
*****
My wife left at seven o’clock in the morning March 2nd.
That morning I had actually dropped off the red truck for AJ - she’s home from spring break and I knew she would need it. I didn’t speak with her, I left the keys in the mailbox.
I left and then I heard from Anjelica. She called me on the phone and asked to borrow money - no - she didn’t ask to borrow money, but her exact words were “can I get some money?”
When she asked if she could get some money I understood what she was probably asking, so I gave her $200 because the camera she wanted went for around that.
I left work at 11:53am and I drove over to the gas station. I met her, I would say, around 12:10, 12:15pm.
We kind of just hung out and stared at each other, you know.
She departed my presence at I would say about 12:40, 12:45pm.
I late getting back to my job, but, my daughter called me, and that’s something she doesn’t do. So, I dedicated extra time outside of my lunch break. Because, 12:45pm, I’m supposed to be on the clock.
I got back to work at around 1:15, 1:20pm. (
We do not know if his employer has confirmed this.)
I know our neighbor saw her after one o’clock departing. She waved to him. (
This neighbor didn't come forward until two weeks later.
2:00pm is the last physical sighting of her driving the red truck back towards the house with a white, small, compact car following her. (
Insider info tells us that the witnesses are not certain of their dates/times.)
My neighbor reported at 2:03pm he saw, behind my red truck that was parked in my driveway, a small white 4 door compact car.
(Insider info tells us that the witnesses are not certain of their dates/times.)
Justice, my second oldest daughter, comes home from school at 2:25pm that day. My 18 year old daughter, Anjelica Hadsell, was not present at the home. The red truck was still there, however, it had been moved from the left side of the drive to the right side.
*****
So, if many of the details WH told us are false, for what reasons did he tell us these? What did he need to cover for? What really happened? These are the kinds of questions I have.
