DexterMorgan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 8,480
- Reaction score
- 10,105
okey doke. thanks.
You're very welcome.
okey doke. thanks.
They had to have arrived before 3PM. That was the time the housekeeper was set to leave (according to numerous articles.)
If they got there at 5PM...that hard working lady would still be alive.
No not crazy. I'm on the fence with this one. At the beginning I was convinced it was SS. I'm still in that camp quite frankly with one foot dangling out. The video of the perp has always bothered me because it is not time stamped. The 17:51 that we see is not from the camera. Some say it is because it was never changed from daylight savings and is actually 16:51 I'm still unconvinced. It could be from noon for all that we know and he could have planted some incendiary device inside to ignite later... Crazy I know but maybe not? Sometimes I think that maybe he paid someone to do him a little favour and that $40 000 was meant to be transferred the other way - to someone else to drive his car away and torch it and something got messed up in the delivery. The car being driven away could suggest someone was trying really hard to make it look like an outsider.agree. I had done that. Just curious...with all conversations on this thread pointing to someone or multiple peeps...can anyone paint a picture or rethink the scenario where husband committed the crime? This scenario has not even been considered...i think because ....as hoped...we are all playing into the someone else had to do this. Think Josh Powell. Am I crazy to think this. Thanks all.
Life insurance or scorned lover. Jmo.
i just think the husband did it and many of the things that happened, including car...were all staged to make it look like it wasnt him. Maybe it was murder suicide and he still didnt want peeps to know what he did. We all know sociopaths wear many faces. I also think the husband made the texts from all the cellphones. He worked hard to cover it up...and am guessing he was also the one who wasnt tied up or beaten and he was the one they mention smelled like gasoline. Why couldnt he be the one in sweatshirt with hood? And he turned off or covered cameras on security system. my gut instinct only.
Investigators believe it's likely that the killers gained access to the home Wednesday and kept the victims bound and threatened through Thursday afternoon, when Savvas Savopoulos gave them what they were looking for, sources said.
No not crazy. I'm on the fence with this one. At the beginning I was convinced it was SS. I'm still in that camp quite frankly with one foot dangling out. The video of the perp has always bothered me because it is not time stamped. The 17:51 that we see is not from the camera. Some say it is because it was never changed from daylight savings and is actually 16:51 I'm still unconvinced. It could be from noon for all that we know and he could have planted some incendiary device inside to ignite later... Crazy I know but maybe not? Sometimes I think that maybe he paid someone to do him a little favour and that $40 000 was meant to be transferred the other way - to someone else to drive his car away and torch it and something got messed up in the delivery. The car being driven away could suggest someone was trying really hard to make it look like an outsider.
On the other hand it could very well be a horrible home invasion/ robbery/revenge scenario..sooooooo :fence:
for which victims?
Not to be too graphic, but a knife to his son's throat would compel the father to follow direct orders and not try anything "funny".
No not crazy. I'm on the fence with this one. At the beginning I was convinced it was SS. I'm still in that camp quite frankly with one foot dangling out. The video of the perp has always bothered me because it is not time stamped. The 17:51 that we see is not from the camera. Some say it is because it was never changed from daylight savings and is actually 16:51 I'm still unconvinced. It could be from noon for all that we know and he could have planted some incendiary device inside to ignite later... Crazy I know but maybe not? Sometimes I think that maybe he paid someone to do him a little favour and that $40 000 was meant to be transferred the other way - to someone else to drive his car away and torch it and something got messed up in the delivery. The car being driven away could suggest someone was trying really hard to make it look like an outsider.
On the other hand it could very well be a horrible home invasion/ robbery/revenge scenario..sooooooo :fence:
Thank you .. so it was cash $40k supposedly for a piece or art and the money from his firm Another freaking 'what if' .. I wonder if the perp already knew he was an art collector or if he simply asked SS to get a hold of a large amount of cash fast and SS used that method.
No not crazy. I'm on the fence with this one. At the beginning I was convinced it was SS. I'm still in that camp quite frankly with one foot dangling out. The video of the perp has always bothered me because it is not time stamped. The 17:51 that we see is not from the camera. Some say it is because it was never changed from daylight savings and is actually 16:51 I'm still unconvinced. It could be from noon for all that we know and he could have planted some incendiary device inside to ignite later... Crazy I know but maybe not? Sometimes I think that maybe he paid someone to do him a little favour and that $40 000 was meant to be transferred the other way - to someone else to drive his car away and torch it and something got messed up in the delivery. The car being driven away could suggest someone was trying really hard to make it look like an outsider.
On the other hand it could very well be a horrible home invasion/ robbery/revenge scenario..sooooooo :fence:
I just do not believe that this man burned his 10 yr old son in a house fire. I see nothing in reports about him to make me accept that about him. He reportedly was very close to his children and extended family/ I see no reason for him to have done such a brutal vicious thing. JMO
I just do not believe that this man burned his 10 yr old son in a house fire. I see nothing in reports about him to make me accept that about him. He reportedly was very close to his children and extended family/ I see no reason for him to have done such a brutal vicious thing. JMO
On the other hand, perhaps the son set the fire in the hope it would bring help to the house....