So we already know the decomp dogs "hit" on something in the mom's bedroom. Her lawyer (I think) said something to the effect that decomp doesn't happen that soon and dogs cant hit on it that quick so it must be something else.
BUT, I got to thinking.... I read an awful lot and read the true story of a cat named Oscar who lived in a nursing home. Well, Oscar was not a people person and had little to do with humans but he had the uncanny ability to be able to tell a when a elderly resident was going to die and would stay with them in their room until they died and were taken away. So he WAS able to detect that there was some difference in that human
before they died. He could predict it and was never wrong. Staff came to depend on them to clue them in patients who would die in a few days.
Ok so I realize that they were natural deaths and not a sudden traumatic death like the baby would have had BUT the point is that there was a change and the cat was able to sense it. So if imminent death is detectable then I would think that death in it's earliest stages after occurring would also be detectable.
Just something to think about...
Also from this website:
http://www.ilpwda.com/faqs.htm
"When would I use a search dog and when do I need a forensic evidence dog?
Obviously if you have an assumed live person you need search dogs. Searches for suicides or expected recently deceased persons should also use search dogs. Its a very good idea to use search dogs that have been imprinted on cadaver scent. Dogs that have never had any training on cadaver scent will sometimes act strange or will not know how to communicate their find. The handler does not see the " normal" behavior and may not recognize what the dog has found. Some dogs who have no training will avoid the deceased person. We are learning that at the moment of death changes in the body are occurring. Factors like heat and the condition of the body will also make a big difference in the decomposition. The training of a forensic evidence dog comes into play for cases like: buried bodies, disarticulation, old cases, bone searches, blood evidence, residual scents, crime scenes, building searches, and vehicle searches."
So at the moment of death, changes take place. Lisa's mom wasn't being very observant that night anyway so the baby could have been dead hours before she found her.
But if we believe that the changes take place that soon then does that mean the baby died on the floor?
This is all so frustrating. Finding the answer to one thing in this case (not that I am saying I had the answer) only leads to more questions.