Horace Finklestein
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,658
- Reaction score
- 1
And so GZ was not doing anything illegal by carrying a concealed weapon.
I don't believe he was. He had a permit as far as I know.
And so GZ was not doing anything illegal by carrying a concealed weapon.
And GZ would shoot Trayvon because he was a neighborhood watch/cop wannabee who was not going to let these *****get away anymore. And that is documented by GZ's own words on the 911 calls.
JMHO
Some places read 5 day and other places read 10 day suspension.
BUT suspension -
When I went to school they never suspended anyone for lateness but they did call in the parents.
I am not expecting the school to come forward = I think they would
fear the vigilante types and keep the children safe.
So Trayvon was suspended from school?? So what?!! What on earth does that have to do with him walking home in a neighborhood that he is an invited guest to be in?
I'm sick of all the victim-blaming going on. So, Trayvon wouldn't have been shot to death if he'd: a) not been suspended from school, b) not been wearing a sweatshirt, c) not been walking around at night, d) not been black.
Or, is it rather: Trayvon wouldn't have been shot to death if: a) George hadn't been carrying a concealed weapon as part of his neighborhood WATCH, b) George hadn't pursued Trayvon and picked a fight, c) George had just stayed in his vehicle and allowed LE to handle the situation.
Still, Trayvon had nonviolent behavioral issues in school, and on the day he was killed, he had been suspended for 10 days from Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School in North Miami-Dade.
“He was not suspended for something dealing with violence or anything like that. It wasn’t a crime he committed, but he was in an unauthorized area [on school property],” Martin said, declining to offer more details.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/2...#storylink=cpy
Should we start looking at other victims of crimes the same way? A rape victim? Victims of child pedos? DV victims? Perps want us to believe and accept that the victim did something to "ask for it." That woman wanted it, she was dressed sexy. That six year old was flirting with me. She burned my dinner."
Nope. My kids have had the same issues. Others have posted here that they have honor students facing the same thing. Schools have gotten so strict they give in school suspension for kids rolling thier eyes or standing up to stretch. Suspensions do happens for tardineness. When I was a kid suspensions only happened when something serious happened. It is not that way anymore. Suspensions are not indicative of a behavior or criminal problem.
IMO it makes no difference that Trayvon was suspended for tardiness and that the picture of him was photoshopped. Does anyone here really think that that one photoshopped image of Trayvon changes the public's perception to make everyone feel sorry for him? That is ridiculous!
You don't think a lot teenagers have attitudes and have something to prove? He may well have started something physical with GZ for daring to follow him when he didn't like it.
We are talking about who jumped whom.
I can see TM doing the jumping and I can see why
I can also see GZ doing the jumping because he was a bit too eager to catch a thief, and he knew the cops were on their way.
IMHO - IF TM did the jumping NO he does not have the right to jump the neighborhood watchman.
Since so many hear already hung GZ (without knowing the facts)
I think it is important to look at TM - maybe he is not a squeaky clean kid at all?
And maybe being dismissed from school is a good place to start looking....
I AM LOOKING.
I am appalled by any case that hangs someone just because - there is no evidence.
HOWEVER - I will continue to say.... I think it is Negligence. ON ALL PARTIES.
GZ - probably Negligent Homicide
LE - Sloppy work all the way.
Just because the poor boy is dead does not make him pure or innocent.
NOR does it make him guilty or deserving of this outcome.
I have daily interaction with older teens and very few have anything to prove. Most older teens are good kids, emerging young adults,. The media is full of reports about those with attitude, those who break the law, and those who are destructive. But they are the minority.
Most are good kids, we just do not hear about them.
JMO
Do we even know which pic is the original?
I read the suggestion that the photo was altered to make him look sweet and the make people feel sorry for him, but I don't buy it at all! It was photoshopped to even the skin tones is what it looks like to me. Not at all uncommon!
I have to disagree. Suspensions have to be indicative of something, otherwise what's the point? They certainly aren't rewards.
The post says pic 1 is the original from the Miami Herald. Where the heck did pic 2 come from? And what is the point of it? If pic 1 comes from the MH - what is the discussion? I'm confused and don't understand the point and see no link for pic 2, so I don't know why it was posted :waitasec:
Hoping the OP comes back and explains what it all means.
Salem
But the truth is one photo looks sweet an the other does not.
I have daily interaction with older teens and very few have anything to prove. Most older teens are good kids, emerging young adults,. The media is full of reports about those with attitude, those who break the law, and those who are destructive. But they are the minority.
Most are good kids, we just do not hear about them.
JMO
BBM. I think it's indicative of kids being kids and schools wanting robots. It doesn't make sense that a kid is rewarded with a vacay for something minor, but they are.
So what ? These are straw-men arguments imo. I don't care what picture is used GZ was told to stay in his vehicle by LE he didn't he pursued TM and shot him.
Are you suggesting he looks threatening?