Search results

No amount of money would lure anyone who has held out this long. If they don't have the conscience to tell all they know before hand, I highly doubt that $10,000 or even $100,000 is going to change their mind. JMO

I talked to a family friend and former investigator about searching landfills and he said that they are either searched really early in the investigation (mostly because of physical evidence) or as a last effort (mostly because they exhausted all other options). So, it does not leave much...

From my understanding, LE would have to have reason or probable cause to search the landfill. For all we know, the judge insisted that they exhaust all other avenues before searching the landfill. Or maybe that was LE's call as searching a landfill is almost resigned to admitting she is dead...

Anyone who could do any one of the many crimes speculated by others here, I would believe to not have the same conscience as you or I. Now, maybe they do. But, if they have gone this long without making a peep, finding a significantly decomposed body, I wouldn't think would be much...

Eh, he didn't lose the case. The circumstantial evidence did. When everything is said and done, those jurors would rather see a guilty person go free than an innocent person serve time. And, IMO, that is the way it should be. Unfortunately, in the Anthony case, there is no way to prove...

For all we know, HT is not a POI. However, if she were, and I believe she is, would that be a far stretch? A POI could just be someone with information. Hense the police being interested in them. Maybe they are hiding something. Maybe they are holding something back. Who knows. It...

I think we have all just reached a certain point in this case that normally happens when a missing person has gone unfound for this long a period of time. In recent history, the Aruba case comes to mind. After a month or two, I still remember all of the focus going against the family, and in...

Oh, I agree that it is more likely that the memory loss is drug-related. Someone else had stated that it probably wasn't a concussion because he didn't even have a mark on his face from the punch. I was just pointing out that you don't even have to hit someone very hard to cause a...

Not necessarily. I played baseball in High School and my right fielder dove head first for a fly ball and caught it. Dove on his stomach and just jarred his head a little bit. We ended up playing out the rest of the inning. Maybe 5 minutes or so. When jogging into the dugout and started...

That I had not heard or read anywhere. Which isn't to say that it isn't true. Oh well. Hopefully we'll find out sooner or later. Gotta hit the sack. Hopefully there will be some developments to read about when I wake up.

I see what you are saying. But the part that I am fixated on is using the word "first". He starts by saying what they, LE, found, but cuts himself off, and says, first friends found keys and handed them over the LE. Then LE found keys in the coin purse in the alley. I understand that it...

I think the point is that if friends found keys and handed them over to LE, then how could LE have found keys in the alley?

Or, if there was only 1 set of keys, then it is... her friends found her coin purse in the alley and handed them over to LE, which in turn found keys in it. That could be what he is saying. Otherwise, I would think that there would have to be two sets of keys. Or, he is referring to a 'key'...

Then she would not have to have been smuggled on and therefore her records would be public. All of these indicate having public records of her whereabouts and where she went. As there are none, that would rule out a trip via airplane to anywhere. Now, as someone else has already stated...

For her to be in Israel, many things would have had to of taken place for her to do so. Most of which would provide records that are public. Walker, to this you answered that someone could have smuggled her on. My answer to that is, haven't terrorists been trying to do this for decades? This...

I am assuming that they have enough evidence to continue to prosecute though, even without the confession. From what I have read/heard, they do. However, if the defense can have the confession thrown out, it will worry me about what else they will possibly succeed in throwing out.

I constantly have to correct my thought process from saying that he is a murder, to suspected murder. Regardless what the publicized evidence suggests, he has not been convicted of anything. I wouldn't throw myself into the JVDS sympathizer, but I also try to force myself to continue to think...

But how can one profit from a crime when it hasn't been proven that he has committed it? I understand that there is a lot of evidence, and that there is an extremely high likelihood that he did. However, as far as my thought process is concerned, he has not been convicted of a crime and...

If he is, in fact, a psychopath, then he doesn't. But, he does know what the laws are. I, also, am curious about when this statement was made and how old he was when he made it.

Everyone keeps talking about this guy as if he is a psychopath. However, I am still 50/50 on it. I think we will all agree that he is a pathological liar, and has a huge temper. However, the crimes (that we know of) don't seem to be the standard psychopathic crimes. Yes, he manipulates...