LinasK
Verified insider- Mark Dribin case
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 26,957
- Reaction score
- 25,214
Agreed! I'm not letting Patsy rest in peace just yet!Lurker Steve said:There's not enough to judge this guy guilty yet.
Agreed! I'm not letting Patsy rest in peace just yet!Lurker Steve said:There's not enough to judge this guy guilty yet.
Who said it had to be Patsy if not this guy?LinasK said:Agreed! I'm not letting Patsy rest in peace just yet!
Oh crud because i have read something differnt. I understand that he revealed infomration only known to the killer thru emails to a person working with LE which then accounted for his "confession". But when they arrested him at home, he denied it all.itsreenw said:From what I heard on Court TV, he was already in custody in Bangkok on some other sex related charges and was questioned and arrested after he related information to LE about the crime that was not known to the public. They didn't say he confessed, just that he had TMI (too much information).
I still think the Ramsey's actions made them look awfully guilty and there are so many aspects of the case that make it hard to conceive that he acted alone.
Because I still think Patsy was the writer of the Ransom Note. I haven't seen or read anything to convince me otherwise. She may have been in on the murder/sexual abuse even if this guy was the perp, and not John as I believe.Lurker Steve said:Who said it had to be Patsy if not this guy?
I keep thinking of the "Jump to Conclusions" mat from Office Space for some reason.
BarnGoddess said:Trish and the rest of all you loyal JBR sleuthers. I followed this case from the beginning, especially as I live in Colorado and it was discussed on every talk show daily for at least a year. Plus the newspapers. I really haven't been active in the forum and have not been keeping up at all.
I have a question that I've been trying to post all day.........yep today right up there with Scott Peterson trial highlights.
OK, when I heard about the e-mails to LE and hints of knowing inside information, I wondered if he ever posted here on WS. Trish would know IP's of members. Any possibility?
Thanks Trish for your information above. This latest is bound to be very interesting.
Tricia, I take it this means you can't reveal Pamela Vitale's and Scott Peterson's hats. Supposedly they both posted at WS.Tricia said:Hi BarnGoddess,
I would have no way of knowing if he ever posted here. Yes, I do have the IP addresses but no real names. I don't have any idea who anyone is in real life except for a handful of people on WS.
Unless I know the real name connected to a person's hat I can't identify anyone. Sorry my dear.
LinasK said:Tricia, I take it this means you can't reveal Pamela Vitale's and Scott Peterson's hats. Supposedly they both posted at WS.
I think that you're right. Latest reports state that authorities in the US contacted authorities in Thailand after tracking him down on unrelated sex charges, (the failure to appear on child *advertiser censored* charges years ago?). Thai authorities allegedly then went to his apartment and arrested him to be held for American authorities that were on their way to pick him up. Who knows how much that version might change by morning - lol - but that's the latest I've heard.JBean said:I think it originally reported that he was in the Thai jail but I also believe he was arrested at home.
I have heard the same. I also understand the coinfession came via emails over a period of time.JerseyGirl said:I think that you're right. Latest reports state that authorities in the US contacted authorities in Thailand after tracking him down on unrelated sex charges, (the failure to appear on child *advertiser censored* charges years ago?). Thai authorities allegedly then went to his apartment and arrested him to be held for American authorities that were on their way to pick him up. Who knows how much that version might change by morning - lol - but that's the latest I've heard.
Exactly. That he had been in e-mail communication with a journalist, and I guess the journalist may have realized that this guy had much more information than most people, and he contacted authorities and has been working with them since. That's my impression anyway. And that when the guy was arrested at his apartment, he denied any involvement.JBean said:I have heard the same. I also understand the coinfession came via emails over a period of time.
But now just a minute ago, our local news stopped, the anchor picked up a "bulletin" and said they are just this moment receiving confirmation from an official in Bangkok, that he did in fact confess.JerseyGirl said:Exactly. That he had been in e-mail communication with a journalist, and I guess the journalist may have realized that this guy had much more information than most people, and he contacted authorities and has been working with them since. That's my impression anyway. And that when the guy was arrested at his apartment, he denied any involvement.
I wonder if that might mean that he's confessed SINCE the arrest and any subsequent interrogation. Let's hope that he was handled appropriately and that any interrogation will hold up IF he is indeed the killer.JBean said:But now just a minute ago, our local news stopped, the anchor picked up a "bulletin" and said they are just this moment receiving confirmation from an official in Bangkok, that he did in fact confess.
newtv said:Press Release: JonBenet Ramsey Homicide
Mary Lacy, Boulder District Attorney confirms that there has been an arrest in Bangkok, Thailand for the December 26, 1996 murder of JonBenet Ramsey. The suspect was arrested on August 16, 2006 following several months of a focused and complex investigation. John and Patsy Ramsey both were consulted during the course of the investigation. The Ramsey family has been notified of the arrest.
http://www.co.boulder.co.us/da/pr1.htm
so the district attorney involved in the case calls it an arrest-and offer that its months of investigative work and you dont agree that they are the ones who know about this event..they did it??
so saying he wasnt aressted is simply not true-but its here on this thread as if gospel
thats my point about folks being out to make sure the ramseys are persecuted as if they have been convicted of this crime. as if it was witnessed by some of you..come on..its arrest for murder-the other charge is not related and they say that-but it is a sex crime he has awoled from.
I just dont understand -this is straight from their site.
I thought he confessed in emails. So like a pedophile to harrass parents of a murdered child. Still want to hear the evidence. And I heard he was in Thailand and the panties were made in thailand sooo...that can mean he placed the size 12 on her from some he had or he worked at a place that made the undies.JerseyGirl said:I wonder if that might mean that he's confessed SINCE the arrest and any subsequent interrogation. Let's hope that he was handled appropriately and that any interrogation will hold up IF he is indeed the killer.
Why would he place size 12 panties on her? I think that was Patsy's doing so that JB had Wednesday panties on, just like the size 6's she soiled.Becba said:I thought he confessed in emails. So like a pedophile to harrass parents of a murdered child. Still want to hear the evidence. And I heard he was in Thailand and the panties were made in thailand sooo...that can mean he placed the size 12 on her from some he had or he worked at a place that made the undies.