Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
luvbeaches said:IMO, was not involved. I feel so sorry for him. His life has to be hell.
Actually, let's say Burke wasn't involved but Patsy "did it"... I feel incredibly sympathetic towards HER. If a RDI, whoever it is, I still feel sympathy towards their whole family. What a neverending nightmare.luvbeaches said:IMO, was not involved. I feel so sorry for him. His life has to be hell.
Britt said:Luvbeaches... I agree with you. IMO Burke is the victim of a seriously dysfunctional family.
edited to add: so was JonBenet
dingo said:I have no doubt in beleiving that Burke knows more than what he was allowed to say,but I have doubts about him having anything to do with the ransom note,imo it would have taken forever to coax a 10 year old to write that note,time the perps didnt have.The note was too pristine to have been in the hands of a child
lawman said:a slightly off topic question :was JAR in boulder on the 23rd december 1996.
thank you
lawman said:thanks bluecrab,
myself i believe something happened at the party on the 23rd.
the 911 phone call, jbr comment of not feeling pretty,mr and mrs mcsanta,the person arriving unannounced.also as you say JAR himself was possibly there.
LHP asking for the"loan" a day later for quite a sum of money, and of course the suitcase found by the broken window,containing some unusual items, which surely were not coincidentally in the case.
each of the above is a story in itself, i believe somewhere in there is part of the answer .
capps said:Why does it keep saying that I was the last one to post here ... when the last time I have posted or viewed this thread was 5/29?
Oh no ... another mystery!
JBRMod2 said:No mystery. Every time someone votes on a poll thread (even if they didn't post), it bumps the thread up.
GuruJosh said:Interesting! Almost makes one sympathetic to BC's conspiracy leanings...
GuruJosh said:What I find really interesting about this poll "result" (even though it doesn't have a huge number of respondents) is that (shall we say, being conservative) HALF of respondents believe that Burke was involved in JB's murder.
Let's adjust this stat further, being even MORE conservative, to take account of people who dismiss Burke's involvement out of hand and can't even be bothered responding to the poll (or people who see the poll's author as ME and think i am a dumbo moron )
So let's say, overall, one-third of case enthusiasts believe Burke was INVOLVED somehow.
Isn't it interesting that the BDI theories attract absolutely ZERO adherents among those "public figures" who venture a theory into the arena?
Patsy has her adherents; Singular seems to point at both JR and Fleet; Smit KNOWS it was an intruder.... yet NO ONE posits publicly that Burke did it, apart from the anonymous posters on this forum (such as, err... myself!)
Interesting! Almost makes one sympathetic to BC's conspiracy leanings...