chicoliving
Former Member
Here ya go!
Jake,
Has LE officially cleared Jason after this 6 month period ? If not, you might want to think about the reasons why LE has not cleared him after all this time.
I really can't think of any reasons. And I don't recall ever reading a statement from LE in any murder investigation that says: "This person is no longer a suspect. He is cleared." Have you?
--Jake
My impatience is getting the best of me. I believe the GJ met this week . Now, it is Wednesday night , and there seems to be no activity .
I think the husband committed this terrible crime and can't for the life of me understand why there has been no arrest.
Jake, I wish you could enlighten us with some new info , yet everything is the *same old, same old*.
When will this be resolved ?????
Soon, citygirl, soon. BUT.... just five minutes ago I heard that LE apparently has a big leak. I say "apparently" because the info possibly was leaked by someone else. I don't feel at liberty to tell you what was leaked, but it was something given to LE today. I think it will make the news soon. I'll see if I can find out more.
--Jake
Does it have anything to do with this,
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1377240/
and the statement that they did not do a sexual assault test on the fully clothed victim?
SNIPPED FROM WRAL++++++++++++++
But a piece of evidence that was missed were tests to determine whether Young was sexually assaulted.
According to the autopsy report, the North Carolina medical examiner never performed any, which means investigators cannot rule out sexual assault as a motive for the crime.
North Carolina medical examiner John Butts said such tests are only performed when there are obvious signs of sexual assault. Investigators would not comment on how that could affect the case
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Does it have anything to do with this,
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1377240/
and the statement that they did not do a sexual assault test on the fully clothed victim?
Yep. Someone has been talking to Ms. Lamb. I believe it is someone in LE, but it could possibly be someone else.
I am surprised Ms. Lamb would rely on the AR for her information. There's no way for her to know if LE released a complete AR. But apparently she has a good source who told her no sexual assault test was done.
I've got to wonder why now this interest in a sexual assault test. Before this, I was the only one who showed any interest. Has Ms. Lamb learned something about a possible assault? Or what?
By the way, thank you for the link. For some reason, the story does not show up on WRAL on my computer. Not yet, anyway.
--Jake
yes, apparently there were no obvious signs of sexual assault being she was fully clothed.
Yep. Someone has been talking to Ms. Lamb. I believe it is someone in LE, but it could possibly be someone else.
I am surprised Ms. Lamb would rely on the AR for her information. There's no way for her to know if LE released a complete AR. But apparently she has a good source who told her no sexual assault test was done.
I've got to wonder why now this interest in a sexual assault test. Before this, I was the only one who showed any interest. Has Ms. Lamb learned something about a possible assault? Or what?
By the way, thank you for the link. For some reason, the story does not show up on WRAL on my computer. Not yet, anyway.
--Jake
Does it have anything to do with this,
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1377240/
and the statement that they did not do a sexual assault test on the fully clothed victim?
I don't believe there was any sexual assault based on the fact that the victim was fully clothed and I'm guessing there were other physical signs that there was no sexual assault but I will agree that it would eliminate that defense argument if the test had been done. I guess if the only thing you're interested in is defending a man whether he be guilty or not, this might be a cause for celebration for you.