Mumsy
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 252
- Reaction score
- 2
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!:woohoo:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Part 3 of the motion says the blogger has headlines including "Casey Must Die", "Murder Pre Meditated and Stupid" and "Casey Guilty As Charged". I went back on Dave's blog to October 09 but saw no such articles entitled that. Did MD remove some threads from his blog? Or are those headlines prior to Oct 09? I'm curious what those articles were in reference to, I mean he could headline it "Casey Must Die' and in the article he could remprimand people for saying that without a trial, which means you can't judge a book by it's cover, CM.
I didn't go further back because I have to take the cat to the vet right now.
The link does not work for me.......
A typical and petty response by the defense designed to illicit the anger of the current Judge. Pretty much am used to the defense's tactics by now. Delay. Blame the state for the release of information when they are gabbing on any television that would listen. Fail to show up with the documents that were requested. Fail to provide proof positive that SODDI. Go on a fishing expedition for documents. And finally, try to declare, that nowhere in this current solar system can their so obviously guilty client (so guilty it gives me a migrain) get a fair trial.
To the defense: This defendent is the proverbial abyss. You wanted to try this turkey in open court. You are getting your wish. The state doesn't just allow dead babies to go forgotten. KC is not walking away from this. She will either spend her natural life in jail or be executed. This is your turkey. Stop trying to smear everyone else but your client.
JS, I am sure, is totally relieved to be removed (voluntarily) from this nonsense. JMO.
The defense can be as petty and blustering and all fire and brimstone as they want to...it won't change the fact that their damn client knows exactly what happened to Caylee and refuses to acknowledge as much.
Part 3 of the motion says the blogger has headlines including "Casey Must Die", "Murder Pre Meditated and Stupid" and "Casey Guilty As Charged". I went back on Dave's blog to October 09 but saw no such articles entitled that. Did MD remove some threads from his blog? Or are those headlines prior to Oct 09? I'm curious what those articles were in reference to, I mean he could headline it "Casey Must Die' and in the article he could remprimand people for saying that without a trial, which means you can't judge a book by it's cover, CM.
I didn't go further back because I have to take the cat to the vet right now.
Well, heck! The objection doesn't mention the "tight boots" statement made by Judeg Strickland. Does that mean Mr. Mason does in fact have a problem with tight boots?
Or that it is actually Jose who has an ill-fitting footwear problem?
Inquiring minds want to know these things!
Yes they were there, I read them. However the title really had nothing to do with the content of the article, the articles were actually fair and were actually favorable to the defense. However I think that JB did not actually read the articles, just the title because had he read the articles he would have realized that.
I fixed it in the OP, but here ya go :
http://wdbo.com/common/pdf/orlando/casey_4_30_motion.pdf
Thank you!
The advocate's function is to present evidence and argument so that the cause may be decided according to law. Refraining from abusive or obstreperous conduct is a corollary of the advocate's right to speak on behalf of litigants. A lawyer may stand firm against abuse by a judge but should avoid reciprocation; the judge's default is no justification for similar dereliction by an advocate. An advocate can present the cause, protect the record for subsequent review, and preserve professional integrity by patient firmness no less effectively than by belligerence or theatrics.
I'll be honest, I am a bit flabbergasted. While I have filed my fair share of documents that make subtle references to unfair actions of judges, I could not imagine ever filing something that is this accusatory.
With that said, Mr. Mason makes some valid points, but in doing so, he has stooped well below the very conduct he was criticizing.
While I suspect this "objection" was filed because of Mason's overwhelming need to get the last word in, I nonetheless suspect that it will be the Florida Bar who does so - as I think it would be impossible not to believe his "objection" crossed the line of professionalism. See the commentary for Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-3.5
I'll be honest, I am a bit flabbergasted. While I have filed my fair share of documents that make subtle references to unfair actions of judges, I could not imagine ever filing something that is this accusatory.
With that said, Mr. Mason makes some valid points, but in doing so, he has stooped well below the very conduct he was criticizing.
While I suspect this "objection" was filed because of Mason's overwhelming need to get the last word in, I nonetheless suspect that it will be the Florida Bar who does so - as I think it would be impossible not to believe his "objection" crossed the line of professionalism. See the commentary for Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-3.5
I'll be honest, I am a bit flabbergasted. While I have filed my fair share of documents that make subtle references to unfair actions of judges, I could not imagine ever filing something that is this accusatory.
With that said, Mr. Mason makes some valid points, but in doing so, he has stooped well below the very conduct he was criticizing.
While I suspect this "objection" was filed because of Mason's overwhelming need to get the last word in, I nonetheless suspect that it will be the Florida Bar who does so - as I think it would be impossible not to believe his "objection" crossed the line of professionalism. See the commentary for Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-3.5
I'll be honest, I am a bit flabbergasted. While I have filed my fair share of documents that make subtle references to unfair actions of judges, I could not imagine ever filing something that is this accusatory.
With that said, Mr. Mason makes some valid points, but in doing so, he has stooped well below the very conduct he was criticizing.
While I suspect this "objection" was filed because of Mason's overwhelming need to get the last word in, I nonetheless suspect that it will be the Florida Bar who does so - as I think it would be impossible not to believe his "objection" crossed the line of professionalism. See the commentary for Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-3.5
Oh Wow, that is very interesting Mr. Hornsby, I just wonder if anyone will actually take any action since there hasn't been any action taken against JB and company thus far.Such as KC admission that JB sneaks her things in jail.