That's a lot of emphasis on DNA that was collected by hilariously inept officers and tested in a lab that was not even accredited to do that type of DNA analysis. Not to mention, Stefanoni refusing to turn over some data that would help determine whether or not the DNA was properly handled.
2 independent experts hired by the court disproved this "DNA evidence" and that is in joint with 20 other experts hired by the defense. Yet somehow the prosecution is absolutely, without a doubt, right, but the other 22 are wrong.
Biased? Yeah, I think so.
I am leaning toward this case being a joke now.
But I will ask you as well since you are so sure that they were given a fair trial and are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt:
Why did they convict RS of this crime and sentence him to 25 years when they could not even place him in the apartment?
The bra clasp should not be admissible since it was kicked around on the floor until it got filthier and filthier and collected the genetic material of five different persons. IMO, the way the "evidence" was collected was enough to have them acquitted because it was hilariously inept.
The kitchen knife is not evidence, either, since Stefanoni indicated in her released lab notes that the results were too low to indicate a match to MK and the sample was below INTL standards.
The knife didn't even match the wounds or stains, so it could not possibly be the murder weapon.
So what do they have that proves RS is guilty of this crime and should be sent to prison for 25 years?
And please no speculation. Give me direct evidence.