Maybe it was a test to see if the killing was gratifying enough to target easier more defenceless victims. Or maybe the killer wanted to know if killing without sex was satisfying enough. Or maybe the guilt after the kill lead the killer to stop his murderous spree. The point is unless we know whether Gerrard Ross was sexually assaulted we wont know.
What has bothered me, and I note one of the more respectable posters Bartholomeus also noticed it too, Was that Bradley Edwards was still part of child atheltics despite no longer having small children attending. And that seemed a little paedo'ish. Might not be anything if u weren't a known suspected serial killer, but it almost seems like he may have had paedophile tendencies, which actually makes the whole sexual element tot the Gerrard Ross case even more confusing if he was the killer because in my mind he may have raped the child or just killed the child. But it makes it harder to know what he was really like around kids now that we know he was a serial rapist with a hardon for victims clothing. Ive always wondered if this kill was to throw the police off and lessen the heat around the heightened CSK case during those years
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
