....
Nobody is saying you can't take your own money out in cash, it's just that specific thresholds exist for a reason and an amount of $40k can and would
raise an alert for lots of people. I'm sure there are specifics that can indicate whether it may be for
nefarious reasons vs entirely innocent reasons. I have no idea what SS banking habits were. I didn't make up the laws, I'm just reciting what they are and why some of us might think it noteworthy to carry around that amount of cash.
Yes, regulations are in place to try and prevent crime and potential ransom money would be one of those crimes.[/QUOTE
] bbm
bbm
1 A one time $40,000 currency transaction, raising an alert for lots of ppl?
Yes, maybe for some ppl.
Not so much for others & fin institutions. From my 20+ yrs employment experience in branch ofcs & home ofc of national financial institution, this ^ transaction is not a brow-raiser, ime. $40,000 currency transaction, then local branch or home ofc completes CTR form & moves on w bus. of day.W a one-off transaction,
NBD - as far as currency reporting law. Now if an employee had reason to believe a
ransom situation prompted the currency request,
could be diff story (I don't recall any like that at our firm, ime). However our software kicked out reports highlighting what would appear to be attempts to structure transactions to evade CTRs. An officer reviewing these internal reports would decide whether to complete & file CTRs, poss'ly leaning toward "over-reporting." JMcts.
bbm
2 Nefarious vs innocent reasons for currency?
The CTR form that a bank, brokerage, et al complete does not req or ask info about 'reason' for the currency. Some legit businesses operate on currency; some crim. enterprises deal in large amts of currency. The
IRS is responsible for sorting out who is
$ laundering and engaging in other
tax avoidance schemes. In completing & filing CTRs w the IRS, banks & brokerages do not shoulder that burden. JMcts.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_transaction_report
See [PDF]104 Currency Transaction Report - Internal Revenue
www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/fin104_ctr.pdf
FelicityLemon -
I agree - without knowing Mr S' and AIW's banking patterns and practices, who could say his requests to bank s/h/raised alarm there.