I don't think we know that at all. I have no idea whether Cindy will be the same person with the same outlook and the same views a year from now or five years from now or ten years from now. People can and do change. I believe that, although not everyone does. I just think we can't tell right now what the future holds for that family.
In my experience, and in the experience of the professional writers I've read, people are very stable over time. Adults, especially. Patterns of behavior and belief that creates the behavior are very stable, over time.
If you've lived long enough in this life, you know how rare this is. I hope CA eventually comes to a more credible and realistic attitude toward her granddaughter's death. I will feel great sorrow for her when and if than occurs. I will NOT give her credit NOW because she MIGHT get real in the future. When you are wrong, you are wrong, whether or not you might come to a more 'right' conclusion later on.
Besides, Dr Phil didn't ask her whether she'd find fault with Casey if 10 children she was responsible for turned up dead. (That would really be a bizarre question!) He just asked if she'd let Casey babysit.
As a side note, I really don't think that other children are in any danger if they're with Casey Anthony. I don't think it's a good idea for her to have more children herself for a long long long time (if ever). But even if I thought she had intentionally murdered her daughter (and I don't), that doesn't translate to her being some kind of homicidal maniac who runs around preying on children everywhere. At least not for me.
No it doesn't. But it DOES translate into her being some kind of negligent, short-falling mother because her child DID die under her care, whether she died accidentally or deliberately or under negligent circumstances.
Would YOU allow a person convicted by a grand jury and having gone through a grand jury recommended first degree murder trial to babysit YOUR babies? With all respect, you are an intelligent and thoughtful person. Would you? I wouldn't. No fricken way. Even the slightest chance, would you risk your babies? I wouldn't. Would you encourage or stay silent while other folks stated they'd let their babies be cared for by KC? Then why would you say that? I mean this question with respect, I promise.
There are NO babies or children in this world that are "generalized". So how can you say this? If there is even the SLIGHTEST chance a child (anyone's child) could be harmed via inattention or negligence, how can you say this? OTHER people's children belong to them, not you. I perceive you would be, or are, a very conscientious parent. Why would you say this? I apologize if this offends, I just do not understand
