“She (Jordi Clements) went to the front door and saw that it was open,” the report stated.
“Her dog then charged the door and the door shut.”
Why did she go to the front door? What caused her to go to the front door? And saw that it was open, okay. But is this when she sees the "tall man in a black hoodie" running away from the house? Her dog then charges the door,
then being when she went to the front door. What made her dog charge? Was it "the man" standing in the door(way?). Was it because "the man", Jordi or something else made a noise or caused the dog to "charge the door?" This is all very exciting but fizzles out at the end with, "and the door shut." How did it shut? Did the dog shut the door when it "charged the door?" That would seem the most likely and we could just infer this is what is meant-but since we don't have more information we will leave it with: the door shut.
Did Jordi see "the man running" before "the dog charged the door and the door shut?"
Jordi Clements told the police officer that she saw a tall man wearing a black hoodie and blue jeans running away from the house, according to the report. She wasn’t sure if the front door had been unlocked, and the officer observed no damage to the front door, the report stated.
At what point did she see the tall man running away? Maybe this is information in the report and we do not have all the details but as these statements stand my (unprofessional)statement analysis has my hinky meter on alert. But, again I may be missing important information.
A tall man wearing a black hoodie and blue jeans. Seems cliche' to me, especially the black hoodie part. :twocents:
She wasn't aware if the front door had been locked or not. Well, again what made her go to the front door?
The report says there is no damage to the door. But yet LE took it as evidence? I wonder if they are going to look for dog prints? :lol:
But, seriously. Why would they take the whole door?
IMHO(for right now: more information is needed) there is something not quite right, using statement analysis in the story the daughter gives about the earlier "break in."
It also reminds me of those "ADT" commercials, where a young woman is home alone during the day and a guy in a black hoodie and jeans runs up and kicks in the front door. The alarm goes off and everyone is safe.
I find this case interesting. I have only followed the Casey Anthony case. I believe I have been spoiled because of the sunshine law in Florida. In other cases, do sleuthers only have media reports to give them information? TIA.
In my sleuthing, I do not wish to make light a tragedy or dismiss the feelings of anyone. My heart goes out to the victim and her family.
:cow: