And then there's this part:
"Bring Kids Home is actively seeking legislative support for a new law that blocks-- Jurists, Prosecutors, Defense Attorney's, Witnesses, Principal Parties, and even the Media from profiting off of murdered children cases."
Wow. Do these people think anything through? Some of these entities that are mentioned actually provide a pretty good check and balance ~ and doesn't the media profit indirectly even when they are helping spread the word about missing children? :dunno:
Apparently BKH doesn't believe in the 1st amendment nor capitalism. What their saying is if a child is murdered, no one can publish anything about it unless their a non-profit organization. It makes little sense.
BBM. Thanks EU. I've been thinking about their plan for environmental education. Environmental issues can be a political hot potato. Maybe they can throw in immigration and gun control education for children while their at it. I don't get the concept myself.
BBM. Thanks EU. I've been thinking about their plan for environmental education. Environmental issues can be a political hot potato. Maybe they can throw in immigration and gun control education for children while their at it. I don't get the concept myself.
BBM. Thanks EU. I've been thinking about their plan for environmental education. Environmental issues can be a political hot potato. Maybe they can throw in immigration and gun control education for children while their at it. I don't get the concept myself.
I think the concept is if you are thinking of getting rid of your child do not use duct tape because it's not good for the environment. Just a guess... jmo
And then there's this part:
"Bring Kids Home is actively seeking legislative support for a new law that blocks-- Jurists, Prosecutors, Defense Attorney's, Witnesses, Principal Parties, and even the Media from profiting off of murdered children cases."
Wow. Do these people think anything through? Some of these entities that are mentioned actually provide a pretty good check and balance ~ and doesn't the media profit indirectly even when they are helping spread the word about missing children? :dunno:
Apparently BKH doesn't believe in the 1st amendment nor capitalism. What their saying is if a child is murdered, no one can publish anything about it unless their a non-profit organization. It makes little sense.
In other words,"please use bio-degradable restraints only when tossing your child in an environmentally sensitive wetlands".
Bring Kids Home is pleased to announce we are in the final stretch. When we started in the summer of 2011, we set our fundraising goal at $200,000; and with generous donations, grants, and financing that number is now under $50,000 remaining to be raised. Here are a few brief updates:
http://www.bringkidshome.org/update.htm
Funds From Florida:
Sadly less then $3,500 was donated by the citizens and the local business community of Florida
Oh I'm positive they got that saying from reading here - we used it constantly, particularly before the trial.:maddening:
BKH have publicized that they have someone there at the site on weekends. . . and offer counseling to those who visit.
Do they have a "collection box" setting out or anything? Are they attempting to sell the visitors their bricks when they come? Asking for contributions? I wonder if they're trying to make the people who come feel as though they should make some sort of "love offering" or voluntary contribution in order to visit the place. . .
I hope none of this is happening as they don't own the place and it seems like collecting any money there at this time would be premature. I don't want anyone to feel pressured into "giving."
Anyone been there or know if this is happening?
Those poor people who have contributed! How can the writer (who is the author, anyway?) make claims that the memorial is being exaggerated and it is really a very small place:
"The site is very small with parking for just a few cars. Around the USA there are many of these small parks and when you drive by you often don't even notice that a park or walkway is even present."
But wait! But wait . . .
"Environmental Education Has Been Added
The memorial will incorporate education on the subject of Missing and Abused Children with Environmental Education; a unique and exciting combination."
Maybe everyone who donates will get a ShamWow! or a Slap Chop, too. hwow:
Quoting my own post so you can see how they've updated the "Update" since my original post on the subject:
"Environmental Education Has Been Added
The memorial will incorporate education on the subject of Missing and Abused Children with Environmental Education; a unique and exciting combination which was suggested by regulatory agencies from the State of Florida, great idea."
Okaaay then. The morbid idea of combining the site where a murdered child was dumped, rotting away like bagged garbage, and teaching Environmental Education was not BKH's idea ~ but they think it's a great idea.
(Regulatory agencies? I wonder how many different agencies could all dream up the same blunderous mistake?) Sorry folks, this newest edition's attempted explanation/correction is so inflated that it's become even more insulting and unbelievable.
Are they using us as their copy editors? :wave: :seeya:
Maybe they are using us as editors. I wonder which "mystery" regulatory agency their using for all this good advice? Apparently the agency wishes to remain anonymous to protect themselves from obvious criticism. This is getting ridiculous.
Thanks, RANCH ~ Did you notice their quote claims it's more than one agency! They said "agencies." That makes me sure it's not true. Two or more could never come up with such idiocy, could they? It's all in BKH's over inflated imagination, imo. When the criticism stung they tried to insert an excuse or deflect the blame onto the state of Florida's regulatory agencies. :sigh: