puakenikeni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2015
- Messages
- 1,333
- Reaction score
- 519
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This sounds right to me. I think the blanket being used to transport her makes sense.Hmm, I'm trying to imagine that area and what he was doing that left behind Group A and Group B. Since Group B (body parts) were scattered, seems logical he dropped them. Group A left in a pile because he hoped to return? Thought he'd find them again in the dark?
Could Charli have been rolled up in the blanket, carried through the grass with Group B being accidentally deposited along the way and then buried? Before he buried her he removed her clothes and took off his jeans and gloves and then headed back to the car to leave. Charli's cellphone rings or beeps with a text message and he drops everything in a panic.
OR
Charli murdered in her car and dragged to flat ground in her blanket so that he can use his machete to remove any identifiers. Group B removed, he rolls her naked body up in plastic and duct tape and buries her. He gathers up Group A and B in the blanket and heads to the car. He wants to burn Group B, should be easy right? Only some of Group B falls out and gets scattered along the way. Group A left in a pile and forgotten because cell phone rings or dog barks.
My only problem with this is the burying. To bury requires a shovel or spade. Her body didn't just disappear. I know MSAR searched high and low for her in that vicinity. Somewhere on a hillside she is wrapped in plastic.
Taking the last part first, yay, I'm not the only one interested in that connection. The girl is on the witness list. There was also a TRO issued for him to stay away from her in the month or so when he was still out after he was charged with burglary, that showed up on the judiciary site.Just taking this lime idea further, and bouncing off NL:
1. Is it correct that group B ( the body parts ) were found the day AFTER group A ( items of clothing, paraphernalia )? Perhaps they were not there until late that night? Suppose the finding of those articles had panicked him into removing the remains he'd planned to leave there? The lime theory would allow for this, as the more defleshed & peripheral parts (thin-skin parts like scalp, finger tips, & jaw) separate, fall out & scatter--especially in the dark, and even be further scattered of kicked around as he struggles with the tarp-wrapped, disintegrating body.
2.. She could have been murdered ON the blanket. Subdued for the drive--knocked out, drugged, or something else--but preferably no blood in the vehicle. Duct taped quiet and bound. Remember, Sunday could have given ample prep time--for finding the right hidden place to dig a girl-sized hole, place a waiting tarp in it, even stow a couple of large bags of lime... Unconscious or tied up -- fighting for her life and her child--he cold-blooded and also provoked. 20 wounds in the same spot. It sickens to think about all this. Grieves. Yet, it has to be examined. I want to know--would the full womb itself protect the mother from the stabs? As a barrier? Hence his grotesque stabbing repeating in a frenzy? Then, as he planned it, remove clothing, drag on blanket to tarp-lined depression, having lined it with ample lime. Next roll the body onto the bed of lime and cover thickly with the next bag and maybe another for good measure--the clothing having been removed to assure contact with the skin. Then, close up the tarp, sealing with the duct tape. That done, strip down and wash up. ...Why leave jeans, gloves, tape and her clothes? Didn't expect to be found, maybe. ...As was noted, it was the ping and only the ping that caused them to go to that site. And he was lazy (we heard) --so not apt to clean up his own mess.
3. Somewhere, I think she is in a large plastic bag. Maybe at the dump. I feel worst of all saying that. But, that would make sense, to my mind.
4. Referring to some talk earlier, about the grill and other car parts. AND Pua's (right?) making the connection between the robbery and the car part person--this house in Haiku where they found the grill, etc. this seems to be very important, and it's been largely dismissed. Girl once associated with SC gets robbed of jewelry & computers, tires also slashed--the stuff found months later, after the murder, at his house. But it sounds as if they only found out about the robbery because they had visited her house to investigate the SUV grill & other parts--then she reported the robbery AND the supposed perp--SC! Then the search of his house & finding the stolen items, proving his involvement with the house where the car parts were, right? What to make of all this?
I can definitely see him being arrogant about the density of the jungle that he knew so well and others did not. I can see him not fathoming the depth of search that would be organized.I keep going back to he really didn't think he would be caught. It is a huge jungle. Chances of finding what he did was pretty slim.
Sloppy because he is that arrogant. He didn't expect the aftermath of his action.
Maybe it's just that simple.