LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 29
The only good news is that even now, two years later, the defense has nothing. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they asked if the judge could rule on the trial and not a jury. Whatever it takes to make sure the case does not have to get tried again, is the lesser of the two evils, as far as this huge waste of money.
http://www.wftv.com/video/23474629/index.html
http://www.wftv.com/video/23473853/index.html
http://www.wftv.com/video/23474395/index.html
What did we learn about Mrs. Barrett, the defense, in May insisted , literally "Quite frankly, I don't think she can be replaced".
Sad part is you ask any employer and they will tell anyone can be replaced. Plus hasn't Ms. Barrett had plenty of time to get information she needs from KC. Of course I realize KC lies but with Ms. Barrett's expertise she should have made KC aware of how important the truth will be in her penalty phase should it reach that point. If Ms. Barrett had not gotten to that point with KC then what use is there of keeping her on as she is not there in the capacity of a replacement for "Cookie". jmo