MurriFlower
Inactive
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,980
- Reaction score
- 15
SD has listed what he believes is the 'evidence' against the Rs. I went through point by point with rebuttals, but I can see this isn't getting anywhere, and frankly it's getting a bit boring.
However, it started me thinking.
Because there is no 'hard evidence' to prove they are guilty, SD has listed a lot of circumstantial and anecdotal evidence, which he and many RDI state makes up a 'totallity of evidence' that points to their guilt.
So, I wanted to ask RDI, what of these individual things could be removed before they began to question their guilt or were convinced of their innocence?
I'll put them in the same order as SD, merely because he has listed them in this way, not because of their order of priority, nor because I think they are important.
Which ones(s) would you take out in order to satisfy yourself that IDI??
1. Fibers found in incriminating places on the body and crime scene are proven not be from PR's jacket.
2. Police prove it was possible for PR to have stepped over the RN on the stairs.
3. Police find the credit card charge for the amount previously thought to be the cord and tape, was in fact for washing powder.
4. The knife found at the scene was identified as not the one belonging to BR. The quote attributed to him about the killer having a knife is proved not to have been uttered.
5. Wrapping of the body is no longer thought to have been exclusively attributable to a parent having murdered her.
6. There is no truth in the killer having murdered her from behind so they did not have to look into her eyes, nor having a touching aversion.
7. The ligature around her wrists is proved to have been secured behind her back like a straightjacket and her arms pulled above her head, disproving the theory that the wrist ties were ineffective.
8. The tape on her mouth was found to have been of sufficient length to gag her.
9. The RN is proved conclusively not to have been written by PR.
10. The wearing by PR of the same clothes on two consecutive days is dismissed as of no significance to the crime as she frequently did this.
11. Examiners who stated that they could not eliminate PR as writer of the RN confess they were wrong.
12. The garrote was found to have been effective in strangling JBR and was not used as staging.
13. It is proven that JBR was headbashed at the same time she was strangled and that these both occurred following the sexual assault.
14. It is announced that JBR was not assaulted with the paintbrush.
15. Profilers who indicated the RN was written by someone of PR's background admit they were wrong.
16. A picture of JBR apparently showing a bruise was proven to have been doctored by the tabloid.
17. Black fibers found in JBRs underwear are proven not to have been from the Israeli shirt belonging to JR.
18. The redressing is seen in other murder victims who were not murdered by their parents.
19. JBR was found to have arisen and eaten pineapple when her family was asleep and returned to bed prior to the assault.
20. The Rs polygraph results are released indicating they told the truth about not being involved in JBRs death.
However, it started me thinking.
Because there is no 'hard evidence' to prove they are guilty, SD has listed a lot of circumstantial and anecdotal evidence, which he and many RDI state makes up a 'totallity of evidence' that points to their guilt.
So, I wanted to ask RDI, what of these individual things could be removed before they began to question their guilt or were convinced of their innocence?
I'll put them in the same order as SD, merely because he has listed them in this way, not because of their order of priority, nor because I think they are important.
Which ones(s) would you take out in order to satisfy yourself that IDI??
1. Fibers found in incriminating places on the body and crime scene are proven not be from PR's jacket.
2. Police prove it was possible for PR to have stepped over the RN on the stairs.
3. Police find the credit card charge for the amount previously thought to be the cord and tape, was in fact for washing powder.
4. The knife found at the scene was identified as not the one belonging to BR. The quote attributed to him about the killer having a knife is proved not to have been uttered.
5. Wrapping of the body is no longer thought to have been exclusively attributable to a parent having murdered her.
6. There is no truth in the killer having murdered her from behind so they did not have to look into her eyes, nor having a touching aversion.
7. The ligature around her wrists is proved to have been secured behind her back like a straightjacket and her arms pulled above her head, disproving the theory that the wrist ties were ineffective.
8. The tape on her mouth was found to have been of sufficient length to gag her.
9. The RN is proved conclusively not to have been written by PR.
10. The wearing by PR of the same clothes on two consecutive days is dismissed as of no significance to the crime as she frequently did this.
11. Examiners who stated that they could not eliminate PR as writer of the RN confess they were wrong.
12. The garrote was found to have been effective in strangling JBR and was not used as staging.
13. It is proven that JBR was headbashed at the same time she was strangled and that these both occurred following the sexual assault.
14. It is announced that JBR was not assaulted with the paintbrush.
15. Profilers who indicated the RN was written by someone of PR's background admit they were wrong.
16. A picture of JBR apparently showing a bruise was proven to have been doctored by the tabloid.
17. Black fibers found in JBRs underwear are proven not to have been from the Israeli shirt belonging to JR.
18. The redressing is seen in other murder victims who were not murdered by their parents.
19. JBR was found to have arisen and eaten pineapple when her family was asleep and returned to bed prior to the assault.
20. The Rs polygraph results are released indicating they told the truth about not being involved in JBRs death.