Darcyline
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2010
- Messages
- 1,300
- Reaction score
- 8
Perhaps they didn't bother to enhance the pictures and ask about a potential person in the back seat. Perhaps they didn't check up with the work to ensure this person never left the site at ALL that day (and if he went to lunch, they didn't verify his presence at the restaurant he indicated visiting). I mean, if this guy appeared cooperative with "nothing to hide", how far did they really go to check him out? Many psychos appear to have "nothing to hide". I'm just sayin'. IMO what they SHOULD have done (and I find it doubtful) is to have this guy load up his truck with the exact equipment that he says was in there, in the approximate location, and drive past the area again, getting on video, then compare those stills.
I do agree that mistakes could be made. However, they did enhance the photos (well, at least claimed they did) and they did ask about other passengers and verify with those other passengers. They went as far as I think is reasonable for LE to do-checked out the vehicle and verified his alibi with the actual people who saw him that day. Everything checked out and the truck was clean. Legally, they are restricted about what they can do when everything checks out clean and the person is cooperative.