I don't mean to offend anyone but I would appreciate if someone would explain to me how LE should have "known" Caylee was in that weed-choked, snake (and Lord know what all) infested, heavily wooded acreage.
Not sure if you're talking to me or not...but I said IF the area concering the tips was regarded as a dump site(it has been suggested in this thread the area was trash strewn), that site should have been followed up more closely following the tips. I stand by that...however I never said LE should have "known" little Caylee was there. :waitasec:
I do believe the people who followed up on the meter readers tips should worry about their careers with OCSO. And rightfully so. If the follow-ups had been handled better, little Caylee would have been found earlier. But that doesn't necessarily translate to this area being the first place LE should have looked for her.
Agreed
It is very easy to sit in our computer chairs and criticize but, if we were in LE's shoes, starting a month behind, with no idea where the poor child might have been disposed of, I don't think we would find it so easy to find her either. JMO.