I hate to suggest this, but maybe they are all friends that got high together, perhaps he's a dealer? maybe the unknown girl was with him just to party and perhaps Jaren owed money (which would explain why boyfriend was left with none?) the girl in the video may look like she is having a good time at the time but what if she was just a witness and not a participant? Now she has to worry if she's next?
just a theory?
I have considered that theory. I think it's difficult for some people to imagine that the dismembering was not some sort of thrill for the killer. It's entirely possible that the person only did it to conceal the crime and/or dispose of her. One thing that is clear is that this was not some wealthy man and his wife. These two aren't sharp dressers. They're not looking to impress. They're walking through the door on business.
Upon entering the club, it does not look like the were carded or had to pay a cover charge.
I have considered that theory. I think it's difficult for some people to imagine that the dismembering was not some sort of thrill for the killer. It's entirely possible that the person only did it to conceal the crime and/or dispose of her. One thing that is clear is that this was not some wealthy man and his wife. These two aren't sharp dressers. They're not looking to impress. They're walking through the door on business.
thats what i was thinking and they seem friendly with the girl at the door. does anyone know if they stop cover charges after a certain time? or if its a slow night?
The way they interacted with the staff also suggests a possibility that they are known, local, and friendly with people in the area. Looks almost like the guy shakes the other guy's hand outside before coming in, also.
two from video - hope this works!
I have considered that theory. I think it's difficult for some people to imagine that the dismembering was not some sort of thrill for the killer. It's entirely possible that the person only did it to conceal the crime and/or dispose of her. One thing that is clear is that this was not some wealthy man and his wife. These two aren't sharp dressers. They're not looking to impress. They're walking through the door on business.
Covers only on the weekend.
It is hard to understand why it was necessary to remove her hands and feet if it was just for disposal or transport purposes.
I am sorry but what is on his right arm facing the camera?
BTW..thank you so much, Glezell, for posing these still shots!
Unfortunately, after seeing a few of these cases, dismembering is done to hide the crime/body/make it un-identifiable. There's usually no other reason (well except for a few like Dahmer and Magnotta).
Here is the video of the couple entering ...
http://www.sunherald.com/2012/06/12/4003427/pictures-video-released-of-couple.html
Officials said the couple are not suspects in Lockhart's death and they could be in danger also.
That's a big purse. Ladies, is that the kind of purse you'd be taking with you to a club at 1:47 a.m.? What could it contain? Drugs? A knife? Just girl stuff?
She looks very thin.
He looks comfortable to the point that it seems like he knows nobody is going to mess with him. Like he has a reputation that precedes him.
Unfortunately, after seeing a few of these cases, dismembering is done to hide the crime/body/make it un-identifiable. There's usually no other reason (well except for a few like Dahmer and Magnotta).
I have considered that theory. I think it's difficult for some people to imagine that the dismembering was not some sort of thrill for the killer. It's entirely possible that the person only did it to conceal the crime and/or dispose of her. One thing that is clear is that this was not some wealthy man and his wife. These two aren't sharp dressers. They're not looking to impress. They're walking through the door on business.
Fingerprints. There's no doubt he/she/they thought the smaller pieces (head, hands and feet) would be destroyed by natural elements in the water thus making identification difficult.