Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the kind of racism that doesn't make it big in the media broadcasts because it is so ugly! Something like Michael Vick gets tons of press. I haven't even heard of this case until it was brought up on a Vick thread. I'm surprised Cal hasn't posted on this one. And some people wonder why some blacks have the attitudes they do about whites....not only is their treatment historical, it still happens today. I find that embarrassing and shameful. Those that argue/blame blacks always play the race card should be on this thread too. Funny that no one has posted here that are making so much noise about blacks defending Vick haven't said a word here. Amazing this thread only has 7 posts and was started weeks ago...seems everyone would rather argue *IF* Vick is being judged before his trial because he's black. Yet no one wants to talk about this.
For me, this case underscores the power that is held by local district attorneys. They have complete discretion over the cases that are prosecuted and those that are not. Presently, the only remedy is an angry electorate. It would take an amendment to the state constitution to change this. Unfortunately, this part of the problem will most likely be overlooked because of the racism issues.
Does anyone know what law was broken by hanging the nooses from the tree?
What could an aggressive state AG do?I don't know LA law (no pun intended) but here in TN it would be issuing terroristic threats. It's identical to threating to hang someone, and it isn't taken as a prank.
You're right about the DAs; only an aggressive state AG could fix this.
Crypto6
Crypto6
What could an aggressive state AG do?
Last time I checked, nothing! Not even the governor can overrule a district attorney! It would take a constitutional amendment to rectify the problem of these all powerful district attorneys. It's astonishing, but every time a case has gone to court, the district attorneys have ended up with more power! It's scary.
One article said Jena is 85% white, 12% black. Doubtful the DA is worried about his job. He is well within the law concerning who he prosecutes, and who he doesn't. I don't have any links for you. I did some research about 10 years ago in the law library at LSU. The courts can't fix this one. A constitutional amendment could but who's going to support it? Don't look for changes any time soon, if ever.Bully pulpit; make it so hot that DA either gives or is removed. This would have to be one aggressive AG, but it could be done here. The publicity would be a lightening rod. Also, there could be Fed charges; I'll have to look to see if any Fed laws were broken with the nooses.
Yes, you are right that there is too much power concentrated in the hands of the DA. Makes me wonder whether a tribunal system would be better. The additional Fed jurisdiction is in place for that reason; if the good-ole-boy network won't administer justice, the Feds can.
Thanks for the reply; if you've got any good links on this problem, pls send them on.
Crypto6
Dearest AmandaBrown,:blowkiss:Wow I cant believe I live in Louisiana and havent heard of this, but I am well aware of racism in Louisiana. There are a few places where its like that. So sad that after all these years people cant get over it and accept everyone.
To my dearest AmandaBrown,:blowkiss:Thanks very much darkshadows that article was very insightful. I hate that those things happened and wish that we could all get along.
One article said Jena is 85% white, 12% black. Doubtful the DA is worried about his job. He is well within the law concerning who he prosecutes, and who he doesn't. I don't have any links for you. I did some research about 10 years ago in the law library at LSU. The courts can't fix this one. A constitutional amendment could but who's going to support it? Don't look for changes any time soon, if ever.
One article said Jena is 85% white, 12% black. Doubtful the DA is worried about his job. He is well within the law concerning who he prosecutes, and who he doesn't. I don't have any links for you. I did some research about 10 years ago in the law library at LSU. The courts can't fix this one. A constitutional amendment could but who's going to support it? Don't look for changes any time soon, if ever.
That is very interesting! Now I see there is a sliver of hope when one finds themselves confronting a rogue DA. However, I see the AG "...may obtain permission from a district court..." That is a bit disheartening as there is nothing that compels them to do it. :doh:Found this interesting tidbit:
The attorney general for Louisiana is the chief legal officer in the state, and his duties are numerous. According to the Louisiana Constitution, the attorney general is to protect the interest of the state by representing it in civil matters and by advising and assisting a district attorney, upon request, in a criminal case.
Also, as a check and balance to corrupt or incompetent district attorneys he may obtain permission from a district court to institute, prosecute or intervene in a criminal prosecution. These duties, as further defined by the Legislature, are extensive and are essential to the welfare of the state and its citizens.
How is it then, that with such vast responsibilities and extensive duties, current Attorney General Charles Foti continues to find the time and the resources to take actions outside the scope of the duties of his office and yet fails to perform those tasked to him? Whether it is incompetence or arrogance, I do not know. But it is obvious that he has a problem focusing on the duties trusted to him by the voters of this state.
Under the previous Constitution the attorney general had the unrestrained power to prosecute any criminal matter that he desired. The Constitution was revised in 1974 and, due to perceived abuses, this power was specifically taken away from the attorney general. Under the current constitutional scheme, the district attorney offices are tasked with the responsibility for criminal prosecutions in their district. It is not the job of the attorney general to seek out individuals for prosecution.
Link
Sounds like the AG can do something here, but probably does't have the political muscle to pull it off.
I see the reason for your prognostication of a poor outcome: The legislature took unchecked power from one official and gave it to many, the DAs. And the Founders knew about unchecked power.
Crypto6
Did anyone else watch Cooper's report on Jena last night? I thought that he went easy on the town and that really surprised me.