so basically those composites are useless? I don't see any resemblance
does anyone else?
Not between the pic of a younger suspect, but there is a resemblance to this more recent pic of the suspect.
Generally the Parabon system works best to eliminate potential suspects, ie. through eye/hair/skin colouring, as opposed to recreating an actual composite. imo.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/we-got-...-lisa-ziegert/
Very lengthy and interesting article. An example from a different case, of how it may work in terms of eliminating potential suspects.
rbbm
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/07/forensic-science-justice-crime-evidence/
Then, in June 2015, Monica Quaal, a lead DNA analyst at the lab that works with the sheriff’s office, learned about an intriguing new way of exploiting the information contained in a DNA sample—one that would not require a suspect’s DNA or a match in a database. Called DNA phenotyping, the technique conjures up a physical likeness of the person who left the sample behind, including traits such as geographic ancestry, eye and natural hair color, and even a possible shape for facial features. Quaal immediately thought of the Bouzigard case, in which the DNA left at the scene was virtually the only lead. She contacted Mancuso and Lt. Les Blanchard, a detective on the case, and they sent their sample to Ellen Greytak, director of bioinformatics at Parabon NanoLabs, a company specializing in DNA phenotyping.
Here the investigation took an unexpected turn. Based on the available evidence, the detectives still believed her killer was likely Hispanic—perhaps a member of the Mexican crew who had fled the area soon after committing the crime. But the person in the DNA-generated portrait Parabon produced had pale skin and freckles. His hair was brown, and his eyes were probably green or blue. His ancestry, the analysis said, was northern European.
“We kind of had to take a step back and say all this time, we’re not even in the right direction
“In the future,” says Armentrout, “we would be doing this at the beginning of the investigation—who should and shouldn’t be on your suspect list.” As the field of inquiry narrows, the DNA of a suspect not excluded by the Parabon Snapshot could be tested against the actual sample left at the crime scene. And Parabon’s phenotyping is not intended to identify specific individuals.