Not sure which thread to post to as I've not been following the Cummings case too closely, although I am peripherally familiar. I ran across a youtube video of Misty during a hypnotism session (sorry if this has already been posted) and was very impressed with this young girl's seeming truthfulness and desire to tell the truth.
Link to video:
YouTube - Misty Croslin-Cummings hypnosis session
My subjective viewpoint on the above video is that she seems to really want to share the truth about that evening, as she remembers. To me she does not appear to be some devious and wise beyond her young years sort of manipulator of truth and lie. For goodness sakes, she is extremely young and unless she is a master of manipulation at that age she seems to be doing a very good job of "pretending" to be innocent.
I am a fan of NG because of her often hard hitting questioning that sometimes diverges into the realm of intense subjectivity, but puts people on their toes, which is often a good way to to re-direct to objectivity. In Misty's case I don't see this. I sense a bit of bullying of a young girl who is being ganged up on by an intense mass of very trained and adult journalists and national broadcast stations who are clearly focused on destroying her credibility in order to gain the best ratings.
These groups gang up on her decisions to ask help from her lawyer when questions get tough. And her decision to refer to her lawyer is even called a suspect decision? Why can a young girl not ask for her lawyer's assistance when questioning from trained adults inquire of her? Suddenly she's pure guilt because she asks her lawyer for help?
Does all of this innuendo and attack make her nervous? Does that make her hubby nervous? Does that create some intensity that may affect a lie detector test (might she be getting so nervous that she thinks the world is against her because nobody seems to accept her version of what happened that night?)
She has indicated that she thinks that the "other side" of the family may be responsible for HC being missing. She indicates that the little boy got up during the night, why could this not be an indication that the child heard something that nobody else did, and that something was perhaps someone that he was familiar with, and that someone turned the kitchen light on for one reason or another.
Maybe the block was placed in the door so that "someone" knew that HC was in the home and that they would be carrying the child out the door, possibly implying that "one person" came to the house for a specific reason, and knew about the family, where the child was sleeping, and who would be in the home. A whole lot of family seemed to have visited that evening, as MC claims in her hypnotic state (relaxed state, IMO, nothing weird).
Her version of events were clear, distinct, and not contradictory to anything I have heard to date.