RR0004
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 19,987
- Reaction score
- -27
Yes, this particular motion was weak.It looks like the battle will continue elsewhere on another day!
Yes, this particular motion was weak.It looks like the battle will continue elsewhere on another day!
I thought that was interesting as well, but I suppose he didn't want more paperwork directed at him.Phishing, fishing. Defense, defence. In the words of the crackhead heard round the world, "Can't we all just get along? :crazy:
The part I am confused about is it seems that Judge S is now walking JB through how to properly word and file his motion. I would think he would have denied it just on technical merit and not even have had to address Mr. Nejame's response. He should have never even made it up to bat with a motion asking for things he has no right to have. Judge S should not be explaining to attorneys how to write motions. He should have merely denied and stated why.
I reckon I aint doin' surgery 'cause I don't know how.
Truthseeker - I agree. The State is playing games with production.
As for MN's responses to JB's motion, it is adequate - nothing special. JB can re-do his SDT with a supboena. And, since TM said that searchers were in that area on 2 occasions, I don't know how NM can say they didn't search that particular area and make JB take his word for it.
JB needs to go take TM's deposition.
Phishing, fishing. Defense, defence. In the words of the crackhead heard round the world, "Can't we all just get along? :crazy:
The part I am confused about is it seems that Judge S is now walking JB through how to properly word and file his motion. I would think he would have denied it just on technical merit and not even have had to address Mr. Nejame's response. He should have never even made it up to bat with a motion asking for things he has no right to have. Judge S should not be explaining to attorneys how to write motions. He should have merely denied and stated why.
I reckon I aint doin' surgery 'cause I don't know how.
I'm not sure what other cases MN has at the moment...but I do know JB is probably barely sleeping trying to keep up with all that is coming at him. He has a huge responsibility in this case.
I'm not sure which motions you are talking about that weren't filed properly, but so far, he's won pretty much every motion he has filed.
NeJame creamed Baez is court.
imHHHHHo.
The legal term is actually a "fishing (not phishing)expedition". Like when you throw a hook in the water hoping to catch a fish!
Nejame's filing to fight B's attempt to get every piece of paper that Equusearch had is a thing of BEAUTY!!
Among my favorite points that he makes are the following:
1. Florida courts have no power to order Texas-based Equusearch to do anything.
2. B's scatter-shot request for every piece of paper is proof that he has NO clue whether there's any relevant info so B fails to meet the MINIMUM requirement to force a someone to spend their life amassing private records to turn over.
3.(AND THIS IS MY FAVORITE!) B has a history of demanding records and then failing to even pick them up OR pay the fees for the reproduction costs.... so Nejame asks B to pay IN ADVANCE and PROVE that the funds used to pay the reproduction fees COME FROM LEGITIMATE SOURCES!!!
So, I'm loving this filing. To check it out for yourself, go to:
http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0129/185974...
Truthseeker - I agree. The State is playing games with production.
As for MN's responses to JB's motion, it is adequate - nothing special. JB can re-do his SDT with a supboena. And, since TM said that searchers were in that area on 2 occasions, I don't know how NM can say they didn't search that particular area and make JB take his word for it.
JB needs to go take TM's deposition.
IMHO Nejame should not handle this case because he was counsel for the parents.
Tim's assertion that there is not proof that he searched in that area is wrong, he himself said he searched that area.
The statement that Baez had requested tip info then not picked it up is pretty poor. It is true that Baez requested that info, but Law Enforcement made up a disk with primarily psychis tips which caused a financial hardship on this defendent in my opinion. The family would have had to pay over $900 for the worthless psychic tips before having another disk made up of legitimate tips resulting in another $900 for a second disk.
Why so many games by LE? You would think that they would not want to do anything to mess up their case and cause any reason for a mistrial or an appeal! This "game" by the prosecution needs to stop!
It is very important to establish if any searcher had looked in that area to establish if the bag was there when they searched.
Why do you all want people to withold evidence or make it difficult to find out the truth? It is only your opinion whether or not Casey knew that body was there.
If it was seen but wasn't looked in, then so be it. At least it would prove it was there! I am sure there were bags people did not look in or see on the searches for one reason or another. You ALL should want to find out the truth!
Do you want the jury to have a doubt that the bag was there because Tim is mad and doesn't want to aid in the defense at all? If that comes out during the trial it will only help Casey. IMHO this is a game that may backfire on the prosecution.
Think about it!
I'm not sure what other cases MN has at the moment...but I do know JB is probably barely sleeping trying to keep up with all that is coming at him. He has a huge responsibility in this case.
I'm not sure which motions you are talking about that weren't filed properly, but so far, he's won pretty much every motion he has filed.
Truthseeker - I agree. The State is playing games with production.
As for MN's responses to JB's motion, it is adequate - nothing special. JB can re-do his SDT with a supboena. And, since TM said that searchers were in that area on 2 occasions, I don't know how NM can say they didn't search that particular area and make JB take his word for it.
JB needs to go take TM's deposition.
NeJame creamed Baez is court.
imHHHHHo.
correction...The A's have now sent a letter to TES requesting all records....anyone hear Greta last night say that now BC wants full records of TES and searches?? or was I dreaming??
correction...The A's have now sent a letter to TES requesting all records....
I am new here, so I do not know how to post Greta's show last night, forgive me. She was holding up a paper saying it was a letter from the A's to TES for records....you are right, makes no sense....If this is true, it makes no sense to me at all. The A's are witnesses only in this case. What right do they have to any of TES's information? Are they now attempting to run their own "KC Defence Team"?
If this is true, it makes no sense to me at all. The A's are witnesses only in this case. What right do they have to any of TES's information? Are they now attempting to run their own "KC Defence Team"?