doogiesgirl
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,377
- Reaction score
- 11
I stumbled onto something I think is kinda significant, which probably means it's already been covered here and I just missed it. Plus, I'm not very good at doing searches and I don't know how to attach a document to my post (sorry......but at least I can type)! That being said, here's something I noticed.
In CA's deposition, she made such a HUGE deal out of "C" Zenaida signing the guest card at Sawgrass. For whatever reason, it was just such a big deal for CA. But, when I looked at the guest card, as has been said before, it looked like Mr. Garcia started to write Gonzales first, and that was the mistake that sorta looked like "C", it was the start of the "G". BUT in looking at the guest card, it looked to me like the real Zenaida filled out part of that guest card and Mr. Garcia filled out part, even though I've read that he said he completed the entire card.
THEN on the statement the real Zenaida gave LE, it looks like she AND someone else wrote parts of that statement. But look, when she starts to write her name, she does it again........starts to write "Zenaida", then notices the info is asked for in reverse order, stops and then writes "Gonzales" first.
I don't think this is hugely significant, but for me, it easily shows the "C" Zenaida that CA was using as solid proof that this poor girl's name was different was clearly a mistake and she did it again on the LE statement, confusing last name first, etc as asked for on both forms. Does this make any sense or do I need more coffee?
I understand what you are saying perfectly spyhouston, and to me it makes much sense. Although coming from me (bad eyes, bad memory, etc.) I don't know how comforting that will be! LOL :crazy:
Watching CA shouting about the "C" at her depo like she had "cracked the Limburgh kidnapping" gave me quite a kick. IMO that C doesn't mean a whole heck of a lot in the grand scheme of this case(Caylee's murder or the ZG one). :cow: