Since they do all searches in the same area, it's hard to keep track.
But I am guessing he is referring to the same search along Brighton which the FAA closed air space for?
Capt. Steve Young:
Search along Brighton was just "another tip that didn't pan out."
http://livewire.kmbc.com/Event/Live_Blog_Amber_Alert_Issued_For_Missing_10-Month-Old#ixzz1bAmGSe3F
In this case
every search is a huge deal.
I have never, in any other case... found myself almost daily holding my breath for a few seconds... thinking "that's not good..."
Before quickly saying... "oh wait... it's probably nothing like the other dozen+ times."
Has it crossed ANYONE'S mind to search FURTHER away?
I mean... just an idea. But even if parents were involved, that doesn't mean the child is within a one mile radius.
Every case is not Caylee... some people are more aware of their capacity to be caught and try harder to cover up their crimes.
How about thinking "where would *I* hide something I didn't want found..." and then search there.
Unless there is
100% evidence that someone killed this child and then did NOT drive anywhere...
100% PROOF of that...
I think these close to home searches are a bit much and they need to expand.
Let's just pretend that someone with access to a car committed this crime. Cover all bases? Make sure we don't miss the kid somewhere else?
We
are talking about a 5+ hour time frame here. That doesn't have to be within a 5 minute walk.
Just an idea...